On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 10:31:55AM -0500, Lindley French wrote:
> Not necessarily, since it introduces latency. It may be very useful in
> conjunction with UDP transport, though.
>
> > On Feb 1, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 08:32:08AM -0500, Lindley French wrote:
> >> This approach might allow seamless integration of forward error correction
> >> libraries as well.
> >
> > Wouldn't you want to use that with any socket type? That would mean
> > encoding/decoding gets stacked one on top of the other. Probably a
> > larger change.
> >
> > MfG
> > Goswin
I ment having a ZMQ_PUSH socket that uses forward error correction
underneath. You would tunnel the zmq transport protocol through the
forward error correction library.
MfG
Goswin
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
