Thanks. I also just saw a thread describing how zmqpp was moved into http://www.github.com/zeromq and is now owned by the zeromq organization. So I assume all further work will be done there and benjamg/zmqpp is dead.
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 10:44 -0500, Lindley French wrote: > I recommend zmqpp. It works more like you'd expect a C++ library to > work. cppzmq is a more "C with classes" approach. > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Sean Lynch <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hello, > > I'm new to zeromq and have a question about the C++ bindings. > > I see that there are two different implementations. There is > cppzmq > which looks like just a thin wrapper around the C library, and > there is > zmqpp which is more involved and looks more like a typical C++ > library > rather than a thin wrapper. > > I'd like to know if there is a 'standard' or 'recommended' > binding and > if so, which one? > > Also, related to zmqpp, another bit of confusion comes from > the fact > that the link to zmqpp is to Ben Gray's zmqpp repository, but > this is > actually a fork of zeromq/zmqpp. All of the most recent work > has been > done on zeromq/zmqpp, so I'm unsure why the link would point > to > benjamg/zmqpp and not zeromq/zmqpp. > > Thanks. > > -Sean > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
