Thank you both,
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:44 PM, Diego Duclos
<[email protected]> wrote:
If you don't use CurveZMQ, and someone is able to readily manipulate your
frames anyway, just a checksum won't help you at all. There's already
checksumming at the networking level to prevent corruption.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote:
If you use CurveZMQ the Poly1305 MAC should (hopefully) prevent message
malleability
>
>
>
>On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Turkey Breast <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Can I guarantee that messages in ZMQ won't be modified? I currently have a
>checksum field for my frames that I send, but maybe that's extraneous?
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>zeromq-dev mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Tony Arcieri
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>zeromq-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
