I have implemented TLS at application level in NetMQ and its available as part in netmq. i also looked at zmqcurve in order to add to netmq. I have to say nacl/zmqcurve/libsodium/curvecp is much simpler to implement and to use correctly than TLS and it also suppose to be much faster. I am actually working on porting libsodium to c# and later into netmq. On Mar 17, 2014 6:46 PM, "Indradhanush Gupta" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I am wondering which is the better alternative for security among TLS and > CurveZMQ. I have gone through the blog post by Peter Hintjens ( > http://hintjens.com/blog:36) explaining how to use CurveZMQ and also this > blog post (http://www.riskcompletefailure.com/2012/09/tls-and-zeromq.html) > explaining how to use TLS with ZeroMQ applications. > > Now, although I have a feeling that using TLS could get a little complex > and hard to get right, but the thought that possibly its been tested in > rough waters more than CurveZMQ, makes me think about using it. > > So, can someone please shed some light on this? Which is a better > alternative? Obviously each will have its pros and cons. What are they? > Maybe that will help me make a better decision. > > Thanks, > -- > Indradhanush Gupta > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
