Sorry, that is correct, I'm referring to the Mozilla Public License v2.0.

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:51 PM, AJ Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm assuming you mean The Mozilla Public License Version 2.0 as described
> here:
> http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Thanks for clarifying,
> AJ
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:57:53AM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The LGPLv3+static link license we've used for years has worked well
>> except in one regard: as a custom license, it's hard for some legal
>> teams to digest.
>>
>> The MPL v2, which came out in 2012, solves this problem while keeping
>> the goal of sharing patches.
>>
>> It's not practical to relicense libzmq to MPLv2, however it is for
>> other projects. We're starting with CZMQ, and will broaden this to
>> other projects over time.
>>
>> Does anyone have objections to this shift? If not, I'll document it on
>> the wiki page as a recommendation for new projects. The C4.1 process
>> already has MPLv2 as an allowed license.
>>
>> -Pieter
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> --
> AJ Lewis
> Software Engineer
> Quantum Corporation
>
> Work:    651 688-4346
> email:   [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this transmission may be confidential. Any 
> disclosure, copying, or further distribution of confidential information is 
> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by 
> Quantum. Quantum reserves the right to have electronic communications, 
> including email and attachments, sent across its networks filtered through 
> anti virus and spam software programs and retain such messages in order to 
> comply with applicable data security and retention requirements. Quantum is 
> not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the substance of 
> this communication or for any delay in its receipt.
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to