> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:28:59 -0700 > From: Scott Lewis <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi, > > When I go to > > http://zeromq.org/bindings:java > > It implies that the java binding is written to work with 2.1.10 of > zeromq...and I would like to find out if it works on 4.0.4.
I think jzmq is really geared toward 3.x. Technically, it also seems to work fine with 4.0.x, except that there aren't any bindings to the encryption pieces that (IMO) make 4 interesting. There are some pieces in the code base that have been updated to take advantage of at least some of 4.0's features. I've started writing those bindings, and have them up to the point where I was debugging and unit testing. Then real life issues intervened. > I've also looked at JeroMQ [2], but it appears from doc to be based upon > libzmq 3.2.2. It seems to me that JeroMQ will pretty much always be at least a step or two behind jzmq. It's easier (and, honestly, IMO, a better use of scant time) to wrap a C library than to duplicate its functionality. > Do either/both of these bindings work with 4.0.4? If not, is there any > expectation that they will be (and if so, when?). Encryption for jzmq is really close to the top of my list for things I need for my side projects...but those keep getting pushed off to the side. For anyone who cares, https://github.com/jimrthy/jzmq is the fork. My latest changes are in the debugging branch (because I was debugging my changes when I got derailed). For all I know, the code might be fine and ready to go, and the weird errors I was seeing at the end were environmental issues. > Thanks, > > Scott Regards, James _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
