On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Michel Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't used it, but ZeroVM looks pretty cool, process containers in > general are getting a lot of press lately. I can see how a distributed pipe > system would give them a nice simple tool on top to interconnect sandboxed > processes in a controlled way. Is there some issue or proposal they are > working on?
We're doing this step by step. I'm not sure ZeroVM is using zpipes yet... soon though. > I put some thought into but didn't spike any code on an evolution of the > nerve idea. I've been informally calling them zerodog and zerocat. Oh dear, Cutism... I've been so guilty of that too. I've learned that inventing concepts is often a sign of failure rather than success. :) The dog/cat model does sound much like distributed pipes. > There's an interesting pattern here, distributed management of not only > processes but also the streams of data they produce. Food for thought. One thing we lack in ZeroMQ generally is resilience, supervisor trees and such. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
