Gerry, can you provide a minimal test case that shows the behavior? Thanks.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Gerry Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Peter. I can't try this out till I get home but it is looking like > hwm overflows. > > If you run the utilities you notice the drops start happening after > precisely 1000 events in the first instance (which Is the default hwm). > > There was another largely ignored thread about this recently mentioning the > same problem. > > I also tried setting the hwm values to a number greater than the number of > events and it seemed to have no effect either. > > g > > On 16 Jun 2014 09:32, "Pieter Hintjens" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Gerry Steele <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Big chunks of messages go missing mid flow and then pick up again. There >> > is >> > no literature that indicates that is expected behaviour. >> >> Right. The two plausible causes for this are (a) HWM overflows, and >> (b) temporary network disconnects. You have excluded (a), though to be >> paranoid I'd probably add some temporary logging to libzmq's pub >> socket to shout out if/when it does hit the HWM. To detect (b) you >> could use the socket monitoring. The third possibility is that you're >> doing something wrong with subscriptions... though that seems >> unlikely. >> >> -Pieter >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
