It sounds sensible, yes.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Marcus Ottosson <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Pieter, I'll do that. > > On related note, does my use-case make sense, and do you think it's at all > worth pursuing? > > > On 20 June 2014 12:14, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Marcus Ottosson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > This makes sense, but I'm attempting to run an arbitrary number of peers >> > and >> > they can't all be bound to the same port, can they?. I'm definitely no >> > expert, so do go basic on me, that is ok. >> >> You can't bind multiple peers, indeed. >> >> Take a look perhaps at the CZMQ zbeacon class, which uses UDP. That's >> closer to your use case I think. >> >> There was an attempt to make a UDP transport, which would have given >> you what you need, though that didn't succeed. >> >> -Pieter >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > -- > Marcus Ottosson > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
