Error running make check:

Running CZMQ selftests...
 * zrex: OK
...
 * zgossip: OK
lt-czmq_selftest: zcert.c:65: zcert_new: Assertion `rc == 0' failed.
 * zcert: /bin/bash: line 5:  5981 Aborted                 ${dir}$tst
FAIL: czmq_selftest
============================================
1 of 1 test failed
Please report to [email protected]
============================================
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/sven/checkout/build-iso/pkgs/libczmq/src'
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sven/checkout/build-iso/pkgs/libczmq/src'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1


Platform is Debian 7.5 standard gcc building _without_ libsodium.

zcert_new (void)
{ 
    zcert_t *self = (zcert_t *) zmalloc (sizeof (zcert_t));
    assert (self);

    //  Initialize metadata, even if keys aren't working
    self->metadata = zhash_new ();
    zhash_autofree (self->metadata);

#if (ZMQ_VERSION_MAJOR == 4)
    int rc = (self->public_txt, self->secret_txt);
    assert (rc == 0);
    zmq_z85_decode (self->public_key, self->public_txt);
    zmq_z85_decode (self->secret_key, self->secret_txt);
#else
    strcpy (self->public_txt, "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000");
    strcpy (self->secret_txt, "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000");
#endif
    return self;
}

and zmq has

int zmq_curve_keypair (char *z85_public_key, char *z85_secret_key)
{
#ifdef HAVE_LIBSODIUM

...
#else // requires libsodium
    (void) z85_public_key, (void) z85_secret_key;
    errno = ENOTSUP;
    return -1;
#endif
}

so I'll always hit the return -1.

Is there a suggested workaround for building without libsodium?

otherwise it would seem, that correctly supported ! HAVE_LIBSODIUM should not 
be calling into zcert_new from make check.

I'm fine adding libsodium, but wondering what the bigger picture is when 
libsodium is not present, there seem to be some other related fixes in the 
commit logs.

Thanks

Sven

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to