Certified messaging, yes, but not for pub-sub. Spam is spam. Registered mail is registered mail. However when post offices burn down, even registered mail gets lost.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Holger Joukl <[email protected]> wrote: >> Von: Pieter Hintjens >> >> By magic coincidence I'm sketching out a proposal for reliable pub-sub. >> >> https://github.com/zeromq/zeps >> > > What would be the appeal of having a centralized ZeroMQ broker as opposed > to just using some existing out-of-the box solution, probably (I almost > dare not say it ;-) AMQP-based, e.g. RabbitMQ or QPid? > > Apart from the obvious ZeroMQ goodness e.g. ubiquituous client/language > support and > probably a better world in general... > > As with the aforementioned (or JMS or anything else using centralized > persistent > queues) this would inevitably introduce a single point of failure that > would then > need to be safeguarded with clustering, high availability, cold/hot > standby, you name it. > > Then, of course you'd need to deal with avoiding or recovering from queue > inconsistencies in case of broker failure and resulting switchover and > such. > > Looks to me like this is not an easily-solved problem even for some of > those > rather established (as in available for quite a long time) solutions. > > If you need a strong notion of guaranteed or certified messaging that is, > as in: > Never lose a single message. Ever. > (Yes I know it's really only "as close as you can get to 'never' and > 'ever'") > > Best regards, > Holger > > Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg > Anstalt des oeffentlichen Rechts > Hauptsitze: Stuttgart, Karlsruhe, Mannheim, Mainz > HRA 12704 > Amtsgericht Stuttgart > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
