On 19 November 2014 04:58, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure about this. It looks like "we can do ZeroMQ better", and yet > they stay away from mentioning ZeroMQ as a competitor (as did Martin > in his Strange Loop talk). I mean, how can you say "open source high > performance messaging" and then use AMQP and JMS as your comparison > points? >
It is mentioned in the blog and other places, such that Aeron can sit side-by-side with PGM underneath ZeroMQ. There are a lot of links at the end of the HighScalability.com article, Todd Montgomery chimes in a lot with the references. But I do agree with their design that the core architectural piece is a reliable log, but I am perplexed how Aeron supports congestion control but they are only going to implement back pressure. The major problem with PGM is lack of a congestion control mechanism that scales above 10k/s, the reliability can certainly be improved alongside the memory usage with the log design from Aeron but I am still left wanting more. -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
