Regarding multihope on ZProto we can have a stack of routing id (that will be serialized to the wire) and a method called reply and a method call forward. What do you think? On Feb 6, 2015 10:09 AM, "Pieter Hintjens" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:41 PM, AJ Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is the plan really to drop multi-hop routing? > > I did want, and am glad to get, stories from people using multihop routing. > > I think the situation here is that we're using the multihop > request-reply pattern, it depends on multipart, and that's fine. It's > a standard, it's implemented, and it's stable. > > So we can focus on new patterns (like client/server) quite separately, > and if we make threadsafe sockets, perhaps use them only in these new > cases. > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
