On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:28 PM, MinRK <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There may be reasons this would be super gross and horrible, but it's an > > idea, anyway. > > It didn't solve any identifiable problem, and forced every proxy loop > to become two loops. If multipart is nasty because it makes the > concept of "message" more complex, then this was doubly horrid. > I guess the problems I identified that it solves weren't really problems, then. > > Separating the routing stack from the message would probably be neat > if the result was an atomic message, and proper semantics for using > that routing stack (a "reply" method, for instance). > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
