Isn't this what we were working on during the hackathon in Brussels? It indeed seemed trivial but I recall many were using higher level languages so my efforts ended up in getting malamute support for higher level languages. There were some people that really saw the need of this. I'm wondering whether anybody continued with it after the hackathon or what stopped them from doing so.
Rg, Arnaud On 2016-03-16 21:40, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > It's not implemented. You're not the only lazy bastard around :) > > To make this work is non-trivial. Zyre would make it easy to find > other instances. What you do then is to exchange subscriptions and > then cross publish. And then the same for mailboxes and services. A > federation model. > > I may update the whitepaper to remove all the speculative design. > > -Pieter > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Mario Steinhoff > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey everyone, >> >> the malamute discussion whitepaper says: >> >>> A peer-to-peer cluster of Malamute brokers serving a cloud, where >>> each system on the cloud runs one Malamute broker. Applications >>> connect to their local broker over IPC, and the brokers talk to each >>> other over TCP. Malamute uses the Zyre clustering technology to >>> rapidly discover and connect to new Malamute brokers. >> >> I am a lazy bastard and haven't checked the code yet. >> >> Is this functionality actually implemented? >> >> If not, what would I have to do? >> >> Mario >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
