Hi Luca

Do you also plan to release a CZMQ version ?

Regards

Bruno

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Luca Boccassi <luca.bocca...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 13:26 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 10:32 +0000, simon.giese...@btc-ag.com wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is it possible to do publish the bugfix release 4.2.2 now? We need
> > > one quite urgently now.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot
> > > Simon
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a few fixes queued so sounds like a good time, I'll put
> > together
> > a changelog and push it over the weekend.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Luca Boccassi
>
> 4.2.2 is out: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases/tag/v4.2.2
>
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.bocca...@gmail.com]
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2017 12:41
> > > An: Giesecke, Simon
> > > Cc: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> > > Betreff: Re: AW: [zeromq-dev] Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and
> > > 4.2.1?
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 14:18 +0000, simon.giese...@btc-ag.com wrote:
> > > > Hi again,
> > > >
> > > > I was now able to do a local test with the current HEAD of
> > > > libzmq, which seems to fix the problem again.
> > > >
> > > > To do complete tests in our integration environment, I would
> > > > require a release version. When is 4.2.2 going to be released? Is
> > > > it possible to do this in the next days?
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Simon
> > >
> > > 4.2.1 was released not too long ago, so we could probably do one
> > > sometimes before mid February when there should be enough bug fixes
> > > queued up
> > >
> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.bocca...@gmail.com]
> > > > Gesendet: Montag, 16. Januar 2017 12:26
> > > > An: ZeroMQ development list
> > > > Betreff: Re: [zeromq-dev] Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and
> > > > 4.2.1?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 10:32 +0000, simon.giese...@btc-ag.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > we have migrated from ZeroMQ 4.1.5 to 4.2.1 recently and I
> > > > > notice some behaviour change in some of our test cases. These
> > > > > cases are related to enforcing that some queues run full resp.
> > > > > the HWM is exceeded. Sorry I cannot be more precise at the
> > > > > moment; I tried to reproduce the behavioural differences with
> > > > > some reduced code example, but have not been successful so far.
> > > > > To enable me to facilitate a more focused reproduction of the
> > > > > issue, I have a general question in advance. Have there been
> > > > > any deliberate changes in behaviour between 4.1.5 and 4.2.1
> > > > > that might be related to this? From reading the release notes,
> > > > > I did not find something that raised my attention.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Simon
> > > >
> > > > One major change is that setting HWM works also after
> > > > connecting/binding, is that what you are doing?
> > > >
> > > > There were many other bug fixes that can be seen in the git log,
> > > > can't
> > > > remember all of them off the top of my head
> > > >
> > > > Also what transport mode are you using?
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Luca Boccassi
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to