> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:18:24 -0300 > From: Trevor Bernard <[email protected]> > > James, > > I would check the generated self tests to see how to send and receive > messages.
Do those live somewhere non-obvious? The closest thing I've run across are in czmq/bindings/jni/src/test/java/org/zeromq/czmq. And those all seem to just call the C-level self-tests. Thanks for the suggestion, James > Best, > Trev > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM, James Gatannah > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've been dabbling with the bindings from github and the source >> distribution, and I'm starting to suspect that they aren't in a usable >> state yet. >> >> My specific problem is that I can't figure out how to send a message. >> >> The closest I've managed to get is using Zframe.send(), which takes a >> long parameter for the destination. If I pass in the Zsocket's .self >> member, I get an error about attempting a socket operation on a >> non-socket. >> >> Zsock.send() can't possibly work, since it only passes along the first >> of the variadic arguments. >> >> I haven't spent much time with Zmsg, since I'm using client/server >> socket types, but it seems to have the same problems as Zframe. >> >> Am I missing something obvious? Based on what I've found in the >> mailing list archives, it looks like people expect this to work. >> >> I've run across a few other issues that seem like they should be >> low-hanging fruit (the "standard" czmq socket creation methods really >> should be static, for example), but I've never had a chance to do more >> than glance at GSL when I was reading through the Guide the first >> time, and I've only briefly glanced at zproject. >> >> And, if this is a stable API, then obviously that part couldn't be >> changed anyway (not that that's a barrier to adding appropriate static >> methods). >> >> Alternatively, I see a lot of recommendations here to just use jeromq >> instead. Does anyone have any recommendations about the difficulty of >> implementing CLI/SRV there as opposed to jzmq? As ugly as JNI code and >> that build/installation process is, at least I spent some time digging >> through that code a few years back. >> >> Thanks, >> James >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:34:00 +0300 > From: Doron Somech <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <CAB814uHJGAp+e=SZfCzu_2CWcbr7-HPYzrNk6a5LHR7=-bv...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Try... > > On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Folks; >> >> Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is >> this the correct forum to ask about this? >> >> >> >> Thanx >> >> Rick >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/f76f2c27/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:07:22 +0000 > From: "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. > We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive > mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1 and a > test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. > If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver > on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for > pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. > > We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 > 64 bit. > > Thanx > Rick > > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > Try... > > On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this > the correct forum to ask about this? > > Thanx > Rick > > 3.1.1001 > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> > > 3.1.1001 > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/155bdb1d/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:22:11 +0000 > From: "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122. > > > 3.1.1001 > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Marlborough, Rick > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. > We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive > mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1 and a > test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. > If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver > on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for > pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. > > We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 > 64 bit. > > Thanx > Rick > > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > Try... > > On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this > the correct forum to ask about this? > > Thanx > Rick > > 3.1.1001 > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> > > 3.1.1001 > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/4fc4d962/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:19:29 +0300 > From: Doron Somech <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <cab814ugnvanng_uko3rhdadt3cgbnsc1dp84gvwo31qenc4...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > What type of network? wifi? On same network? What type of switch? Router > between? What port are you using? > > On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122. >> >> >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Marlborough, Rick >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM >> *To:* ZeroMQ development list >> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm >> >> >> >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Folks; >> >> We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm >> transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and >> receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node >> 1 and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the >> receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and >> the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also >> a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. >> >> >> >> We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat >> 7 64 bit. >> >> >> >> Thanx >> >> Rick >> >> >> >> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected] >> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Doron Somech >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM >> *To:* ZeroMQ development list >> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm >> >> >> >> Try... >> >> >> >> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Folks; >> >> Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is >> this the correct forum to ask about this? >> >> >> >> Thanx >> >> Rick >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/558a66e8/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:29:02 +0000 > From: "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > It's a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically > local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is > typically in the 224.15.15.X range. > > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > What type of network? wifi? On same network? What type of switch? Router > between? What port are you using? > > On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122. > > > 3.1.1001 > > 3.1.1001 > From: zeromq-dev > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Marlborough, Rick > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. > We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive > mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1 and a > test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. > If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver > on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for > pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. > > We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 > 64 bit. > > Thanx > Rick > > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > Try... > > On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this > the correct forum to ask about this? > > Thanx > Rick > > 3.1.1001 > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> > > 3.1.1001 > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/9faf0b89/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:48:55 +0300 > From: Doron Somech <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <CAB814uFLXKNKm1EXmdbXORYkpNNj+YU3fxL6H8Q=7AQgO=e...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I suggest to try snifing the network a liitle bit. Alsilo to play with > IGMP snooping. Does regular multicast on same ip works? > > On Apr 11, 2017 20:31, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> It’s a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically >> local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is >> typically in the 224.15.15.X range. >> >> >> >> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Doron Somech >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM >> *To:* ZeroMQ development list >> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm >> >> >> >> What type of network? wifi? On same network? What type of switch? Router >> between? What port are you using? >> >> >> >> On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122. >> >> >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Marlborough, Rick >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM >> *To:* ZeroMQ development list >> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm >> >> >> >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Folks; >> >> We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm >> transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and >> receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node >> 1 and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the >> receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and >> the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also >> a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. >> >> >> >> We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat >> 7 64 bit. >> >> >> >> Thanx >> >> Rick >> >> >> >> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected] >> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Doron Somech >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM >> *To:* ZeroMQ development list >> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm >> >> >> >> Try... >> >> >> >> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content >> >> Folks; >> >> Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is >> this the correct forum to ask about this? >> >> >> >> Thanx >> >> Rick >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> >> >> 3.1.1001 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/fe4ebdd0/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:50:46 +0000 > From: "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Regular multi-cast works fine throughout the system. > > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:49 PM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > I suggest to try snifing the network a liitle bit. Alsilo to play with IGMP > snooping. Does regular multicast on same ip works? > > On Apr 11, 2017 20:31, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > It's a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically > local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is > typically in the 224.15.15.X range. > > From: zeromq-dev > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > What type of network? wifi? On same network? What type of switch? Router > between? What port are you using? > > On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122. > > > 3.1.1001 > > 3.1.1001 > > 3.1.1001 > From: zeromq-dev > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Marlborough, Rick > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. > We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive > mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1 and a > test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. > If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver > on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for > pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. > > We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 > 64 bit. > > Thanx > Rick > > From: zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Doron Somech > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM > To: ZeroMQ development list > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > Try... > > On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > Folks; > Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this > the correct forum to ask about this? > > Thanx > Rick > > 3.1.1001 > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> > > 3.1.1001 > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=X1PaiBKS701YQFr6GMHgFDZppVsktQeear8FMPHqGOg&s=CtMxOGSA9MVXlKlmX97pcpXfEx9cc_45XjBYgTSD37U&e=> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/48767e0d/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:18:06 +0300 > From: Doron Somech <[email protected]> > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > Message-ID: > <CAB814uE6njBTDQi3qW-dXk_6qaAvhroD-x5z2L9==nr5rzk...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Can you include the code for sender and receiver? > > On Apr 11, 2017 20:52, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > > Regular multi-cast works fine throughout the system. > > > > *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf > Of *Doron Somech > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:49 PM > > *To:* ZeroMQ development list > *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > > I suggest to try snifing the network a liitle bit. Alsilo to play with > IGMP snooping. Does regular multicast on same ip works? > > > > On Apr 11, 2017 20:31, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > > It’s a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically > local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is > typically in the 224.15.15.X range. > > > > *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf > Of *Doron Somech > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM > *To:* ZeroMQ development list > *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > > What type of network? wifi? On same network? What type of switch? Router > between? What port are you using? > > > > On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > > Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122. > > > > 3.1.1001 > > 3.1.1001 > > 3.1.1001 > > *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf > Of *Marlborough, Rick > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM > *To:* ZeroMQ development list > *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > > Folks; > > We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm > transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and > receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node > 1 and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the > receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and > the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also > a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions. > > > > We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat > 7 64 bit. > > > > Thanx > > Rick > > > > *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Doron Somech > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM > *To:* ZeroMQ development list > *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm > > > > Try... > > > > On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content > > Folks; > > Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is > this the correct forum to ask about this? > > > > Thanx > > Rick > > 3.1.1001 > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=> > > 3.1.1001 > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=> > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=X1PaiBKS701YQFr6GMHgFDZppVsktQeear8FMPHqGOg&s=CtMxOGSA9MVXlKlmX97pcpXfEx9cc_45XjBYgTSD37U&e=> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/3a9133ff/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > ------------------------------ > > End of zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 13, Issue 9 > ***************************************** _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
