ack, i’ve tested it both ways. figured i’d float the overloading idea since it’s a bit more concise, but could lead to confusion.
i’ll re-factor as an actor call (with the extra headers involved with server_connect, etc) and see how it looks (a bit more gsl hacking todo-). i don’t have a strong opinion either way, wva makes it easier to adopt. as i was flipping through the various ways endpoints are used in _bind|_connect and i don’t think there’s an RFC for that(?). not that their needs to be, but the way PH has apparently brainwashed me over the years, was surprised there wasn’t. :) > On Jul 15, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would recommend using actor calls rather than overloading. > > The endpoint format is already very overloaded and a bit confusing as > it is, having clear API calls is much cleaner and understandable for > users and developers IMHO. -- wes wesyoung.me
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
