Isn't ROUTER-DEALER load balancing though? I've used it in a
REQ-ROUTER-DEALER-REP set up
but in that case the REQ -> ROUTER send does not target a particular
handler on the other side, it
just goes to an arbitrary one and the ROUTER makes sure the reply goes back
to the original sender.
How would my sender (an A node) target a particular B node to receive a
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Justin Azoff <justin.az...@gmail.com>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Patrik VV. <pad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > Not sure why Justin suggested using a ROUTER-Socket on each side.
> Ah yes, I misread the original message. For "one-to-many" you would
> use router-dealer. router+router would be more for many-to-many where
> each node runs the same code and there is no obvious master node.
> - Justin
> zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev mailing list