On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 10:10 +0100, Michal Vyskocil wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for proposal, just gave my opinions to gh.

Can't see them on the PR?

> Are you going to extend C4 for the CI and other systems criteria?
> See https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/issues/1837

PRs welcome :-)

> Michal
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@gmail.c
> om>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > We have been using the draft/stable status for API for a few years
> > now,
> > but the exact requirements for a transition of status have never
> > been
> > finalised.
> > 
> > I therefore propose the following amendments to the C4 RFC:
> > 
> > https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/pull/128/commits/
> > ac42b46a2acdd34e473a73a43e2b5b5724216390
> > 
> > Please provide comments/acks/nacks on the PR:
> > 
> > https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/pull/128
> > 
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Luca Boccassi
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to