On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 20:47 +0000, Cunningham, Graeme wrote: > Can somebody on this list give an indication as to how likely the > Client/Server pattern (RFC41) is to be supported and promoted to > “stable” in the future? > > We’re building a number of interfaces on ZeroMQ in our new project, > but we’re wavering a bit on pattern design, given some of the > statements in the API around Client/Server and the socket patterns > it’s intended to replace. We are aware that the Client/Server is > labelled as draft, but there are still some notable statements in the > API document about REQ/RESP being deprecated. > > Is there a strong intention to continue pushing Client/Server to the > stable API? Should we be pushing that pattern into new designs over > the older socket types? > > I realize such a decision ultimately depends on our own appetite for > risk tolerance, but any insight would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Graeme Cunningham.
When it's ready (TM) Note that the docs have been updated, and the current socket types are un-deprecated as many users expressed the need to keep them (for multipart support) -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
