Dont think this question is relevant anymore, everything boiled down to socket performance. Meanwhile I'll ask another question. In case the proxy will be an issue I'll get back to it.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:06 PM Doron Somech <[email protected]> wrote: > Which binding are you using? > Can you link to the steerable proxy in question? > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:36 AM Ernest Zed <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm running performance tests on our system and I see that our server >> side which uses back/front end sockets consumes much of the CPU time in the >> steerable proxy. Once I switch to regular proxy, things look better. Is >> steerable proxy known as performance bottleneck/big cpu consumer? >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
