Hi Brett,

Thanks again for your answers!

About HWM, do you think it would make sense assuming a HWM of 1 in the model? I think HWM 1 would be the worst case scenario where messages are most likely to be dropped. HWM 1 would mean that there can be only either one small or one large message in transit at a time. If the system satisfies (at least safety) properties in such harsh environment, then these properties must also hold when HWM is increased, right? Increasing HWM in the model would increase the size of the state space exponentially, if I'm not mistaken, and I already have many other parameters causing exponential growth. (Last time I tried, 2 TB of RAM wasn't enough for simulating even three messages.)

I'm not verifying real-time properties such as latency. These will have to be estimated through empirical trials.

Cheers,
John

Brett Viren via zeromq-dev kirjoitti 3.11.2020 klo 18.53:
Over what bandwidth?
It's hard to estimate the actual numbers in production, but in simulations we've achieved data rates around 50 MB/s. Our network bandwidth is 10 Gb/s, so 50 MB/s (i.e. 400Mb/s) isn't even near the saturation point. We should have plenty of safety margin for our application. (This safety margin maybe even as high as 100-1000 times the current measured average throughput of the system, but the system is being upgraded and the data flow is expected to increase substantially.)
My own tests at 100 Gbps bandwidth found zero copy less important than
other things and these other things bring their own problems.
In retrospect, our solution might be unnecessarily complicated. We didn't know in advance what level of performance we'd get when designing the system. We've put hundreds of hours of work into our simulations so we're not going to change the system design anymore at this point. Also, there's a deadline approaching. Hence, I'll just have to endure my zero-copy approach.
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to