I'm not sure either. The ml has been getting more quiet over the years. There are to many communication channels nowadays IMHO.

The community has been using the C4 process successfully over the years which dictates that the PR should be merged. I'm not following libzmq that closely but I will merge the PR if nobody steps forward to explain otherwise.

Rg,

Arnaud


On 05/11/2025 18:45, Nicholas wrote:
Hi All,
Not sure if this is the best place to ask.
I Just wanted to ask about the PR process/ feedback on my PR.

I implemented thishttps://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/4802 <https:// github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/4802> a few months back, and for my use case it has been working pretty well, (currently in production, under fairly heavy load & we have not had any issues.)

I know that the pace of changes with zmq has slowed down, but does this change seem like something that aligns with zmq and should get merged in?

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to