Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan 
administration 


Will There be a Recovery?


By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Economists will scoff at the question in the title. But that's because they are 
trying to fit the present into the past.

In the past recoveries were routine, because recessions were temporary 
restraints resulting from the Federal Reserve putting the brakes on an 
overheating economy. By restraining the supply of money and credit, the Fed 
caused inventory buildup, layoffs, and a halt to price rises and union wage 
demands. With the economy cooled by unemployment, the Fed would take off the 
brakes. Interest rates would decline, money would flow, consumer demand would 
rise and workers would be called back to the factories.

In those days when workers borrowed to spend, they were borrowing against 
rising real wages from rising productivity. In economic downturns, few workers 
actually lost their jobs. They were laid off from their jobs for temporary 
periods. Workers seldom lost their homes or cars, thanks to union funds and 
unemployment benefits.

Today the situation is different. In the 21st century real wages have not 
risen. Workers have spent more by accepting deteriorating household balance 
sheets. They have maxed out their credit cards and spent the equity in their 
homes. Imitators of the US government, American consumers borrow to pay their 
bills.

The expansion of household debt relative to income created the illusion that 
the economy was sound. But the consumer economy was as much of a credit-based 
bubble as the real estate bubble and the financial sector bubble. The economy 
has lost its real basis.

Today it is difficult to stimulate consumer demand by lowering interest rates. 
Consumers are too heavily in debt to borrow any more. Financial institutions 
are too impaired to want to lend to anyone except those who don't need to 
borrow. As the Keynesian macroeconomists used to say, "you can lead a horse to 
water, but you can't make him drink."

And there's another problem. Much of what American consumers purchase today is 
made offshore. Stimulating consumer demand in America puts factories back to 
work, but those factories are located elsewhere in the world.

How does an economy consume more than it produces? Previously, this question 
applied only to poor third world countries. These countries would consume by 
the grace of World Bank loans. From time to time they would pay for their 
consumption by being put through an IMF restructuring program that would 
curtail their consumption to make them repay their loans by forced saving.

The United States has so far avoided such humiliation, because its currency is 
the world money. The US has been able to borrow endlessly, because it can pay 
its debts in its own currency.

This ability might be coming to an end. The US has been using up the bulk of 
the world's supply of saving for years in order to finance its consumption. 
Considering the outlook for the US economy and dollar, the productive nations 
of the world and those with oil have more dollars and dollar-denominated assets 
than they want. The US, with its collapsing economy, its bailouts of financial 
institutions, and its wars, is facing the largest government budget deficit in 
its history, both in absolute amount and as a percentage of national income. 
The easy monetary policy, which the Fed hopes will arrest deflation, threatens 
inflation and further deterioration in the dollar. Foreigners simply do not 
want to lend more large sums to a country that, from all appearances, has no 
way to close its trade and budget deficits. They certainly do not want to lend 
when the interest rate offered is close to zero and the reserve currency status 
of the dollar is in doubt.

Economists and the policy-makers they advise are thinking in the past, a time 
when low interest rates stimulated consumer and investment demand, thus lifting 
the economy. Today the low interest rates threaten the dollar, discourage 
foreigners from lending more to the US, and deprive Americans of interest 
income necessary to their ability to pay their bills.

In the second half of the 20th century, American economic supremacy was a gift 
of World War II, which destroyed the productive capacity of the rest of the 
developed world. American economic supremacy also owes much to communism in 
Russia and China and to socialism in India, which rendered these large 
countries economically impotent. The United States did not have to compete for 
its economic hegemony. It simply inherited it from the choices made by the rest 
of the world.

The situation is different today. Unlike the US, other countries are free of 
the hubris of being the "indispensable nation." They know how hard it is to be 
successful and do not treat success as their birthright. They do not give away 
their economy for nebulous foreign policy goals or for short-term profits. They 
look ahead 20, 30 years while America's CEOs look to the next quarter's profits.

The United States is walking on quicksand. It is dependent on foreigners for 
the funding to conduct the day-to-day operations of its government. Its economy 
is a hollow shell reduced to dependence on a financial sector that is 
discredited worldwide. America's government believes that its foreign wars of 
aggression are more important than any domestic needs, including the health 
care of its population.

Now that its supply route to feed its war of aggression in Afghanistan is 
threatened, the American government has the delusion that it will be able to 
supply its army in Afghanistan through thousands of miles of Eastern Europe, 
Russia, and Central Asia. Only a government totally oblivious to reality would 
imagine that Russia's Putin, whose nose is rubbed in excrement every day by the 
US government, will permit America to transit Russian territory to resupply US 
imperial legions in Afghanistan.

What we are witnessing is a once great power engaging in fantasy to disguise 
from itself that it is a failed state.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan 
administration. He is coauthor of The 
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0307396061/counterpunchmaga>  Tyranny 
of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: paulcraigrobe...@yahoo.com

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts01052009.html

 

Reply via email to