http://www.deccan.com/home/homedetails.asp#Muslims%20seek%20BC%20status

Muslims seek BC status


Hyderabad, May 28: Several Muslim organisations on Monday urged the AP
Backward Class Commission to include members of the community in the BC
list on the basis of their occupations. They pointed out that many Hindu
castes were given reservations based on their occupations. Muslim
leaders and organisations thronged the office of the BC commission on
Monday to present their arguments during the public hearing.

Muslim groups and classes such as Fakeer (Darvesh), Pakeerla (Bontala),
Labbi/Labbai, Qureshi (Butcher), Muslim Rajakas, Thuraka Kasha and
Achukatiavandlu had given representations requesting that they be
included in the BC list. The commission conducted a public hearing in
its office to gauge the public opinion in the issue. Its chairman
Justice D. Subramanyam said that the commission had the powers to
conduct a public hearing though the issue was before the Supreme Court.

"It is not sub judice," he said. "We want to verify the social, economic
and educational situation of some classes of Muslims. It is not being
done on a religious basis." Organisations such as Tanzeem
Islah-E-Mashirah and Jamiat Ulama Hind urged Justice Subramanyam to
include some more classes such as Attar Saibulu, Noor Bhasha, Pathan,
Siddi, Hajjam-Nai, Khatik, Mughals, Mahadavis, Hadeeth and Ahle Sunnat
Wal Jamats in the BC list. "Hindu carpenters, blacksmiths, butchers,
skin tanners, shepherds and other sects undertaking hereditary
professions are being given reservation," pointed out M.A. Hameed,
president of Tanzeem Islah-E-Mashirah.

"But Muslims in the same situation are denied reservation." However,
certain backward class welfare organisations and individuals filed
objections expressing fear that inclusion of Muslims will hamper the
interests of the existing 94 castes in the BCs list. The commission said
it may conduct more public hearings in other districts on the issue. But
it also expressed a doubt whether reservations to Muslims on the basis
of occupation was feasible since there was no occupation-wise break-up
of the community available.

Reply via email to