http://www.hindu.com/2009/06/05/stories/2009060553601000.htm

Opinion - News Analysis

The challenge of being Mayawati

Vidya Subrahmaniam

Mayawati’s 2007 victory was a result of mature, sensible politics. She
must reclaim these qualities if she is to recover the ground lost in
2009.

In the summer of 2007, as the Mayawati-led Bahujan Samaj Party
galloped towards an absolute majority in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly
election, a bureaucrat in the outgoing regime took a bet on the
fourth-time Chief Minister’s career trajectory. “You will see a very
different Mayawati this time,” he told journalists. “Her goal is
Delhi, not Uttar Pradesh, and she will want the world to see a
forward-looking, mature leader capable of running a large and diverse
country.”

There was no reason to doubt his words. Ms Mayawati’s implausible
journey from a Dalit background of deprivation and discrimination to
Chief Minister on her own strength was a story without precedent.
(Barack Obama came later.) It had been made possible as much by grit,
struggle and courage as by strategy, craft and a keen understanding of
what to do when. Ms Mayawati plotted her victory with precision,
making a gradual but astute shift from the exclusivist, strident
Dalit-centred agenda of the past to a pragmatic politics of inclusion
and reaching out.

The dividend came in the form of what U.P. referred to as the “plus”
votes — votes of castes and communities other than Dalits. The plus
voters were the key to winning an electoral majority but they were
also the hardest to get because of their historical prejudices against
Dalits. It did not help that the BSP was itself born in fierce
opposition to the manuwadis. That in the end she breached these
barriers is a tribute to Ms Mayawati’s perseverance, intelligence and
willingness to adapt to the demands of changing times. In the hands of
new-age Mayawati, bahujan (depressed classes) became sarvajan (all
classes), while an innovative new jingle — haathi nahi Ganesh hai,
Brahma Vishnu Mahesh hai (not elephant but Ganesh; Brahma, Vishnu,
Mahesh) — displaced the rabble-rousing slogans of a previous era. Who
could miss the symbolism in the transformation of the aggressive BSP
elephant into a genteel, universal God?

The embrace of conciliatory, sensible politics had expanded Ms
Mayawati’s support base and placed her at the head of U.P.’s first
majority government in 16 years, and it stood to reason that she would
go along on the same path — both to consolidate her position in the
State and to extend her appeal beyond it.


Rashness


However, in office, she showed a rashness that turned on its head the
very logic of her recent makeover. Having worked so hard to achieve
the most important milestone of her career, Ms Mayawati seemed to have
wantonly squandered it all — the goodwill, the votes, the respect, the
admiration. Even without the extraordinary significance of her ascent
to power, the slide would have seemed too quick, too apparent. But
this government had come with high expectations; its historic import
was acclaimed internationally. Indeed, from the vantage point of where
Ms Mayawati stood in May 2007, it seemed entirely in order that the
next stop in this incredible odyssey should be the Indian prime
ministership.

And yet as one travelled in the State for an assessment of the voter
mood prior to the Lok Sabha election, it was impossible to miss the
disillusionment. The two-year-old Mayawati government carried a
heavier burden of anti-incumbency than Manmohan Singh’s government of
five years at the Centre. Nothing the Chief Minister had done since
assuming office seemed designed for any great future role. What was
evident on the ground was quite the opposite of the responsible
politics that pundits prophesied would take her to the high seat of
power in Delhi.

Ms Mayawati’s 2007 victory was the result of an accommodative politics
whose key elements were prudence and moderation. In office, these were
dumped for a self-obsession that was excessive even allowing for the
exigencies of history. Her unique position as a self-made Dalit woman
politician allowed Ms Mayawati liberties not granted to others. In a
country where dynasties habitually came to power, she had
single-handedly overcome debilitating discrimination to reach where
she had. That in the India of Ms Mayawati Dalits continued to be
subjected to unspeakable crimes might have seemed an unacceptable
paradox, but surely the fact was also a pointer to her own struggles
en route to power.

Viewed from this perspective, many things acquired clarity, be it the
admiration she evoked in her community or her own urge to embark on a
grand celebration of Dalit power. In her previous three terms, Ms
Mayawati had devoted considerable time and energy to erecting
memorials and statues to Dalit icons — which was small compensation
for the entrenched institutional prejudices against the community. The
gesture went down well with her core voters who saw it as sweet
revenge for centuries of exclusion and humiliation. Ms Mayawati also
afforded a measure of security to Dalits by strictly enforcing the
Scheduled Castes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. However,
significantly, she also earned a reputation for running a tight,
disciplined administration that many in U.P. would later cite as the
reason to have voted her to power in 2007.

Had Ms Mayawati dedicated a few more projects to the Dalit movement in
her fourth term, few would have objected. But she made building of
memorials and statues the centre piece of the BSP government’s
programmes. A score of gargantuan new projects aside, hundreds of
crores of rupees were lavished on razing and redoing projects already
executed at a huge cost in her previous stints in office. From Lucknow
to Noida on the Delhi border, the pink dholpur stone was omnipresent,
testifying to the culture of waste and self-indulgence made into a
credo by the BSP government.

Even this excess might have passed scrutiny if the Chief Minister had
not erected dozens of her own statues, obsessing over their exact
dimensions, and indeed ordering that they be re-made if they were not
to her satisfaction. The immaturity was evident in the treatment meted
out to a bust of Rajiv Gandhi originally placed at the centre of a
modest roundabout just off the chief ministerial bungalow in Lucknow.
The Mayawati government banished the bust, minuscule compared to her
own statuesque versions, to a far corner of the roundabout, and
installed a fountain in its place.

Poetic justice for what the savarna jatis (forward castes) had done to
Dalits? Not really. In Ms Mayawati’s fourth term, her supporters
expected more than token gestures from a leader who had brought them
out from the seclusion of their condemned Dalit existence and taught
them to think independently. True, Dalit support for Ms Mayawati was
undiminished, some even compared the Dalit memorials to the profusion
of samadhis dedicated to the elite Nerhu-Gandhi clan, but a vast
majority wanted a better standard of living, and a greater and more
visible share in the power structures, which continued to be dominated
by the forward castes thanks to Ms. Mayawati’s sarvajan formula.

At Baraipur, an Ambedkar village en route to Phoolpur, residents
pointed to the disproportionate influence of forward castes on the
Mayawati regime, and nostalgically recalled the BSP’s founding slogan,
vote hamara raj tumhara nahi chalega (we will not brook a system where
our votes got your rule): “It is still our vote and their rule.”


Irony


The irony was too large to miss. In its current term, the Mayawati
government had gone all out to placate the Brahmins, handing them plum
posts in government and allotting them a ticket share of 20 of 80 Lok
Sabha seats in comparison to only 17 for Dalits. Brahmins are roughly
nine per cent of U.P.’s population while Dalits form 21 per cent. But
the Chief Minister’s generosity was largely wasted on the community
which harped on her preoccupation with statue-building and rued the
migration of goonda elements from the Samajwadi Party to the BSP.
Brahmins and other forward castes saw this as a deliberate slight by a
party that had made ending the “goonda raj” of the Mulayam Singh
government the central plank of its 2007 election campaign.

A lot rode on the Mayawati government, which was expected to show the
same enlightened vision that brought it to office with a full
majority. That vision meant directing the government’s scarce
resources towards larger programmes aimed at the uplift of the poor
and the deprived. The many claims in the BSP government’s publicity
brochures notwithstanding, in the public perception, governance under
Ms Mayawati remained confined to a single agenda: promotion of the
Chief Minister. The BSP chief campaigned widely outside the State,
projecting herself as a potential Prime Minister. The travels did not
bring the expected dividends, and the neglect of her own backyard
showed up in the form of the BSP’s far from respectable performance.

Until 2009, the BSP was on the up and up; its vote and seat shares
increased with every election. Election 2009 has broken that trend.
But there is a message in the BSP’s 27.42 per cent vote share: That
all is not lost yet, and she can recover the ground lost provided she
reclaims the qualities that brought her to power two years ago.


------------------------------------

----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD? 
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. 
Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to 
[email protected], OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your 
settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with 
like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to 
[email protected] 

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank 
mail to [email protected] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by 
visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to