(MODERATOR'S NOTE: ZESTGlobal Member Rina Mukherji reacts to the last post:

Telling piece. But it fails to dwell deeper into the effect such out-of 
-wedlock births and transient relationships have on children.
 
Rina)


  The Return of Latin America's Left

  By �LVARO VARGAS LLOSA 
  The New York Times | March 22, 2005
  http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/22/opinion/22Vargas_Llosa.html?
ex=12932800&en=�8e16191d8f3322&ei=P70

(�lvaroVargas Llosa is a senior fellow at the Independent Institute 
and the author of "Liberty for Latin America.")


THE left is in power in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, the Dominican 
Republic and Venezuela. With this month's inauguration of Tabar� 
V�zquez as president of Uruguay, this trend will likely continue. The 
year 2006 could bring a similar leftward shift in Mexico and Peru, 
while in Bolivia the Socialist opposition has been setting much of 
the political agenda since the fall of President Gonzalo S�nchez de 
Lozada in 2003. Although this movement is hardly homogeneous (there 
are major differences between Venezuela's Hugo Ch�vez, Chile's 
Ricardo Lagos and Brazil's Luiz In�cio Lula da Silva), the 
continental pattern is clear.

Behind this tilt is popular frustration with the failures of the 
1990's, a decade of reform under governments of the right that were 
supposed to catapult the region toward development. Despite the 
success of many of these governments in curbing inflation, that 
development failed to happen. Instead of decentralization and the 
creation of a free, competitive economy and strong legal institutions 
open to all, crony capitalism and authoritarianism grew. 

Countries replaced inflation with new taxes on the poor, high tariffs 
with regional trading blocs, and, especially, state monopolies with 
government-sanctioned private monopolies. The courts were subjected 
to the whims of those in power, widening the divide between official 
institutions and ordinary people - one reason recent surveys in Latin 
America have pointed to such widespread disillusionment with 
democracy.

This frustration opened the doors of power to the left. With some 
exceptions like Venezuela, this new left is trying to avoid the worst 
mistakes of the old, especially 1980's-style hyperinflation and open 
war against foreign investors. Some of the results are impressive: 
investment is picking up in Brazil, economic growth reached 8 percent 
in Argentina last year, and a Socialist president in Chile has 
overseen a big decrease in poverty (only 18 percent of the 
population, according to the Inter-American Development Bank, is 
below the poverty line in that country). Politically, despite a few 
authoritarian spasms in places like Argentina, the new governments 
are playing by democratic rules. 

It would be a mistake, however, to think that all these governments 
need to do is stay the course. Unless Latin America's leftist 
governments are willing to deepen reform, the continent is unlikely 
to break free of its recurring cycle of economic stagnation and 
political disillusionment. The good news, however, is that left-of-
center governments in other parts of the world have put such reforms 
into place and lived to tell the tale.

Latin America's rebound owes a great deal to favorable international 
circumstances, from low interest rates in the United States to 
heightened demand for commodities by China and India. After 
experiencing little or no growth between 1998 and 2003, the region's 
economies have benefited from the high price of oil (Argentina, 
Ecuador, Mexico, Venezuela), minerals (Peru) and other commodities 
like soybeans (Argentina, Brazil). 

But investment levels are still low: 15 percent to 17 percent of 
gross domestic product in the majority of countries, compared with 
roughly 25 percent in East Asia over the past two decades. With the 
exception of Chile, poverty is not diminishing. Last year the region 
had a net capital outflow of $77 billion, which is not surprising 
considering that foreign investment has not yet returned with force; 
that is in part a result of social unrest in the Andes but also of 
the perception that many of the structural reforms promoted in the 
1990's have yet to be achieved. 

In order to compete with economies that have undergone reform in East 
Asia and Europe, Latin America's left must dismantle corporatist 
states that hamper enterprise among those who are not close to 
government and, through legal privilege, mock the notion of equality 
before the law. 

Many companies that were privatized in the 1990's (telephone service 
in Mexico and Argentina, and electricity in Peru) still have 
effective monopolies and are in cahoots with regulators. Getting rid 
of these privileges could help to persuade the poor to embrace the 
idea of economic freedom. Significantly reducing high sales taxes 
that were set in times of fiscal profligacy would lift a burden from 
the poorest citizens. Slashing the bureaucratic requirements that 
force citizens to spend up to 80 percent of their annual income if 
they want to set up a private company would also help to empower 
would-be entrepreneurs.

Even more important, decoupling the judicial and the political 
spheres (for example, by reversing an expansion of Argentina's 
highest court that was undertaken by a former president to pack the 
bench) could begin a vital legal reform process in which all citizens 
are given real legal protection. 

Such measures could turn current growth into sustained progress. More 
fundamentally, by reconciling human rights and free markets, two 
notions that have been sadly at odds across the continent, they could 
enfranchise millions. Further reform is the best way to meet the 
current social unrest and prepare for when the prices of Latin 
American commodities go down or interest rates in the United States 
go up - a likely prospect if China's growth slows and deficits in the 
United States keep rising.

Other left-of-center role models for reform abound, from New Zealand 
to Ireland, Estonia and Lithuania. Ultimately, the real challenge 
facing Latin America's left is to avoid the temptation of being too 
conservative.












------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/rkgkPB/UOnJAA/Zx0JAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to