Under-reported'? The Top 10

  By Shashi Tharoor
  The Hindu Magazine | June 19. 2005
  http://www.hindu.com/mag/2005/06/19/stories/2005061900050300.htm

(Shashi Tharoor is the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for
Communications and Public Information. Visit him at:
www.shashitharoor.com)

(The reality is that we are in the thick of a brutally competitive
news environment, with maybe just two stories with major claims on
world attention. The quieter emergencies will never trump these events.)


IN January 2003, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan held a
press conference to cover 16 different issues on his global agenda but
every single question addressed to him was about Iraq. The global news
coverage the next day focused only on the same subject. "Iraq," Mr.
Annan noted ruefully last summer, "has sucked out all the oxygen and
distorted the international agenda."

In response, my U.N. colleagues and I came up with a list of the top
10 stories that we felt weren't getting enough media attention. We
were careful to avoid calling them "under-reported" stories, because
the objective wasn't to point a finger at the reporters. We understood
the pressures that drove the world's news agenda, and we didn't deny
that Iraq was an important story. We felt, however, that there were
other important stories too that were falling off the radar screen
because the media didn't have the space or time for them. And what the
world hadn't heard about, it would not be willing to do anything
about. So we wanted to say to our friends in the press: "would you
please consider reporting these stories too?"

To draw up the list, my team consulted every United Nations department
and agency to find out what they thought the world needed to know more
about in their areas of work. A list of over 60 issues soon emerged,
which we then had to whittle down to the more media-friendly 10. We
tried to choose human interest stories and good-news stories, offbeat
stories and early-warning stories. The result was a compelling mix
that no one could plausibly consider yawn-inducing. The U.N.'s top 10
list, as we privately dubbed it, got some play in the world press in
2004, so we did it again this year, hoping to shake a few consciences
in the world media.

Let me take just one story from the 2005 list to illustrate my point.
Legions of African and Asian teenage girls are approaching childbirth
without medical care this year — and the consequences for some will be
catastrophic. Married and pregnant before their time, as many as
1,00,000 of these expectant mothers will go into excruciating and
protracted labour, lose their babies at birth and be left with severe
tissue damage and chronic incontinence. Without restorative surgery,
their dignity will be compromised and, in many cases, their families
and communities will disown them. This is the legacy of obstetric
fistula, a disease as old as humankind. It is also preventable and
curable and therefore almost unheard of in the industrialised world
today. In developing countries, however, two million mothers are
afflicted, when $300 operation could restore most of these women to
health and their rightful place in society.

But is this news? The media don't seem to think so. There is no sight
of the TV cameras and the editorial indignation so necessary to get
the moral adrenaline flowing for serious political action.

Obstetric fistula

We have obstetric fistula high on our list of neglected stories this
year and we believe the other nine stories we have singled out would
also interest most readers or viewers, anywhere. Everyone remembers
the headlines about Somalia in 1992 and 1993; where is the media now,
as the country bravely, if unsteadily, takes steps towards peace and a
stable government? The world reacted overwhelmingly to the Asian
tsunami but forgot the victims of Hurricane Ivan in tiny Grenada,
still struggling to recover from devastation. Tragic conflicts in
Africa routinely make the news, but who writes about the mission
accomplished by U.N. peacekeepers who will leave Sierra Leone by
December, having disarmed 70,000 former combatants and paved the way
for a new national government? (For the full list, go to
www.un.org/events/tenstories.)

We know we're making the smallest of dents in the public
consciousness, but we couldn't forgive ourselves if we didn't try. The
reality is that we are in the thick of a brutally competitive news
environment, with the war in Iraq and the multinational tsunami
disaster as just two stories with major claims on world attention. The
quieter emergencies will never trump these events. But is the public
getting a fair share from its news leaders? Just how many column
inches or hours of broadcast time does a sophisticated audience need
before it grasps the importance and emotion of a particular war,
disaster, or domestic court case? Does saturation coverage of a few
items, to the exclusion of other important happenings in the wider
world, say something about their priorities or does it reflect a
none-too-flattering judgment of us, their audience? We think it's time
to widen the focus.

Four decades ago the newsman Edward Behr came across a TV cameraman in
a camp of violated Belgian nuns in the Congo calling out, "anybody
here been raped and speak English?" It's never enough to have
suffered; you must be able to convey your suffering in the language
the media wants to hear. That's where the U.N. will try to help — to
give a voice to those who remain voiceless in the world media.








--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to