MORE THAN A TOSSED SALAD
  There must be an internationally agreed definition of terror

  By S.L. RAO
  The Telegraph | March 28, 2005
  http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050328/asp/opinion/story_4532939.asp

(The author is former director-general, National Council for Applied
Economic Research)

After over two years of trial, the Canadian high security court has
acquitted the two accused Sikh fundamentalists of the Kanishka
murders. The Canadian investigation of the Kanishka murders raises
questions about the "multiculturalism" of Canada, the differential
view in the West of terrorist murders depending on the religion and
colour of the victims, the active encouragement for many years by
Western governments of militant movements aimed to destabilize
democratically elected governments and the supine role of Indian
governments under prime ministers of every political hue.

First the facts: On June 23,1985, 329 passengers and crew, the
majority Canadians of Indian origin, were killed by bombs placed on
the Air-India plane Kanishka flying from Montreal to Bombay. Almost
simultaneously, a bomb in a bag meant to go on the Air-India flight
from Tokyo exploded prematurely at the Narita airport, killing two
people. The plane was Indian; those bodies that were found were in
international waters; they were taken to the Irish republic; most
passengers were Canadian nationals; the plane had taken off from
Montreal in Canada. So who should investigate? Rightly the Canadian
police investigated the explosions. It was clear almost from the
beginning that the outrage had been planned and executed in Canada by
the secessionist Khalistani movement. It had strong support among
numerous Canadian nationals of Indian Punjabi origin in Vancouver.

The Canadian police investigation started 20 years ago and relied on
circumstantial evidence. An agent of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, who had infiltrated the Khalistanis in the United
States of America, and a female employee of one of the accused, who
claimed to have been told to carry suitcases that later exploded, gave
evidence in the trial. It has been reported that during the
investigation, differences within the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
resulted in the destruction of some evidence.

The extremely prosperous Sikh community in Vancouver has been settled
there for over a century. In parts of the city, street signs are in
Gurmukhi but many third-generation Canadians still do not speak
English. The community is self-contained. Many members have little
interaction with other communities.

The RCMP over the 20 years of investigations spent a reported $100
million. But it was culturally insensitive, with no Punjabi speakers
among policemen. During the first ten years, the investigations were
haphazard, even careless. The Canadian government was complacent and
unresponsive till Canadian-Indians became restive and pushed for a
vigorous inquiry.

Most of the murdered were Canadian nationals but they were brown. They
included Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Muslims and Sri Lankan Tamils. The
then prime minister of Canada condoled the deaths of so many "Indians"
in a message to the prime minister of India!

The white RCMP had no Sikhs or Punjabi speakers. Sikh Vancouver was a
mystery to them. The wealth of the accused may have in some way
influenced the quality of the RCMP investigation.

The Indian high commission, through intelligence gathered by its
undercover agent, is said to have warned the Canadians that Canadian
militants were planning something like this. But the Canadians took it
lightly, helped by the blasé attitude of human rights organizations.
Even after the murders, the RCMP did not induct Punjabi speakers, get
the Indian police into the Canadian investigation and pursue it
vigorously.

But when a Pan Am plane was blown up over Lockerbie, Canada joined
other Anglo-Saxon countries to mount an investigation. Libya and
Libyans were identified as the perpetrators. They were not only
brought to trial but substantial compensation was paid by Libya.
Perhaps this was because in Lockerbie, the victims were white.

The US did not show concern about this terrorist movement across the
border that killed so many on the Air India plane. Perhaps after 9/11
it might have put pressure on the investigation, especially if the
suspects had been Muslims. But they were Sikhs, and the US put no
pressure.

The Kanishka killings were meant as a warning to India to accede to
Sikh demands for a separate state of Khalistan. It was an example of
an immigrant community acting to resolve unresolved ethno-racial
conflicts in the home country. The Canadian government had done
nothing to stop this (and other) planning of terrorist activity,
fomented, funded and exported to India and on to Indians, from Canada
by Canadian nationals. Indeed, remnants of the Khalistan movement
continue till this day in Canada without the Canadian government
closing them down.

Host countries must not permit immigrant communities to fight their
grievances against their home countries. The West must recognize that
terror in any form must be prevented. This requires sensitivity and
understanding of cultural histories and ethnic strifes among immigrant
communities.

Canada describes itself as multicultural with many cultures forming a
composite Canadian mosaic. It tries to retain individual diversities
but ignores that these diversities carry much emotional baggage of
hostility to other cultures and to home governments. Multiculturalism
cannot be only about preserving cultural diversities. It must pervade
all aspects of national life, from politics to administration,
including the police. India has always had great cultural diversity
and is painfully learning that in a democracy diversities take a long
time to combine into an integrated whole.

The Canadians of Indian origin, unlike white citizens, have no
political clout and are hesitant to vocally demand their rights. That
itself demonstrates the lack, in their perception, of equality between
races. Canada must ponder the implications of this perception.

The Indian government's role has been pathetic. There were also Indian
nationals on the plane, the aircraft belonged to Air India, an Indian
government- owned company, and most Canadians killed were of Indian
origin. But the Indian government has been passive for 20 years. It
abandoned its responsibility to its nationals. It did not ask for
participation in the investigation or representation during the trial.
Instead it allowed the principal plotter to be shot dead when he was
caught in Punjab. There has been no inquiry to establish whether his
killing by the Indian police was also part of a conspiracy to save the
Canadian Sikhs involved in the conspiracy.

After the verdict, the concerned senior Canadian minister has said
that there is no point in any further inquiry since 20 years have
already been spent in the investigation. A thorough inquiry is vital
to find out why it has taken 20 years, so much expenditure, with no
result in finding the guilty, and the dubious role of the RCMP over
these 20 years.

As a country with so much diversity because of immigration, Canada
must comprehensively re-examine the working of the "multiculturalism"
policy. To achieve true integration while retaining cultural diversity
is not as simple as tossing a salad and requires more state
intervention in all institutions.

India must at least now protest that the Canadian government has
failed to identify the killers of its nationals. It must demand that
terrorist organizations trying to destabilize India from foreign soils
not be allowed freedom to operate. There must be a common definition
of terror unbiased towards race or religion. All nations must agree
that they will not permit secessionist movements that aim to
destabilize friendly countries to be organized and funded on their
soils. There must be a neutral international investigation of crimes
as the Kanishka murders so that the religion, race and wealth of the
victims and perpetrators do not determine the vigour of the investigation.








--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to