Remembering the other September 11

  By Farooq Sulehria
  The News | September 10, 2005
  http://jang.com.pk/thenews/

As the fourth anniversary of September 11 is approaching, the other
September 11, the other mastermind of September 11 and the other
terrorist organisation will again go missing in the media hype on this
occasion.

It is not because the Western media are ignorant of the other
September 11, unleashed on Chile in 1973, masterminded by Henry
Kissinger and carried out by CIA. It is because the Chilean September
11 is embarrassing. Or perhaps because world remains the same when USA
attacks another country. But the "world will not be the same again" if
the US is attacked. After all, it is not a dog biting a man that makes
news. It is man biting a dog that makes headlines. The 9/11, 1973 was
a case of routine dog bite. Hence, while a hunt for Osama goes on, the
USA refuses to hand over the other 9/11 mastermind to Chile, even when
Chilean judge Juan Guzman filed an international subpoena for Henry
Kissinger to appear for questioning regarding the coup and its aftermath.

Instead, a war-is-peace kind of joke by George Bush was his decision
to appoint Henry Kissinger to head up an investigation into the
adequacy of US defenses against Al-Qaeda. In a way, it was a wise
decision since "it takes one to know one". But it was like asking
Mullah Omar to investigate abuse of women rights in Afghanistan.

Now when another September 11 anniversary is approaching, it is time
to join Chilean masses in demanding for the trial of Henry Kissinger
for his role in military coup claiming 30,000 lives. A coup
Nixon-Kissinger administration unleashed merely because Kissinger, in
his own words, saw no reason why a certain country should be allowed
to "go Marxist" merely because "its people are irresponsible". The
"irresponsible people" of Chile had voted Communist Party candidate Dr
Salvador Allende to power weeks before the declaration of this
Kissingerian doctrine. Allende's election scared US corporations
(doing business in Chile. The corporation concern was communicated to
Nixon. The president was beholden to Pepsi Cola. As a young lawyer,
Nixon was given his first corporate account by Pepsi Cola President,
Donald Kendall. Nixon's immediate reaction was: Allende was not to
assume office. He screamed: "$ 10,000,000 available more if necessary.
Full time job -- best man we have...Make the economy scream. 48 hour
for plan of action".

Unlike Pakistan, Chile had a military that for 150 years had stayed
away from politics. Chilean General Staff Rene Schneider also posed
problems since he was adamantly opposed to military intervention in
politics. The Kissingerian team planned to kidnap Scheneider and
implicate Allende in this crime. The resulting confusion, thought
Kissinger, would panic the Congress into denying Allende the
presidency. In a rare show of democratic spirit, outgoing president
Eduardo Frei, a Christian Democrat, said he was opposed to any US
intervention and would vote to confirm Allende. Two days before his
oath taking, hired military thugs belonging to a right wing gang
murdered Scheneider. Allende, nonetheless, took his oath to become the
first communist elected head of a state.

On November 9, 1970, Kissinger authored National Security Council's
"Decision Memorandum 93" reviewing policy towards Chile in the wake of
Allende's confirmation as president.

The "Decision Memorandum 93" was merely a reflection of secret cable
traffic that went on at a hectic pace prior to Allende's oath taking.
In one of his cable messages, Kissinger has passed the message to his
agents in Chile: "It is firm and continuing policy that Allende be
overthrown by a coup. It would be much preferable to have this
transpire prior to 24 October but efforts in this regard will continue
vigorously beyond this date."

The "Decision Memorandum 93" proposed routine measures to "make (the)
economy scream" on one hand and remove Salvador Allende by all means
necessary. This is what CIA code-named as Project FUBELT.

All aid to Chile was cut off. The CIA spent at least $8 million to
bring down Allende. On September 11, l973, US efforts finally bore
fruit. A military coup assassinated Allende and destroyed democracy in
a country that had enjoyed nearly l50 years of democratic government.
Thousands were killed. Tens of thousands were tortured.

Dr Salvador Allende, with a pistol in his hand, died the heroic death
of a martyr. Either it was the murder of democracy or assassination of
his friend Dr Allende, that Noble laureate legendary Chilean poet,
Pablo Nureda, found it hard to live anymore. It was him the Chilean
Communist party had nominated as presidential candidate but he had
stepped down in Allende's favour. A week after military coup, heart
broken poet also died of "September 11".

A post-junta truth commission found that the Argentine military had
"disappeared" at least 10,000 Argentines in the "dirty war" against
"subversion" and "terrorists" between 1976 and 1983. The human rights
groups in Argentina put the number at 30,000.

Newly declassified State Department documents show that Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger gave his full support to the Argentine military
junta and urged them to hurry up and finish the "dirty war" before the
U.S. Congress cut military aid.

When Vanity Fair columnist Christopher Hitchens (yes the one George
Galloway called "drink-sodden ex Trotskyist popinjay") was not on the
same side of fence as Kissinger is, he considered Kissinger an
appropriate candidate for the dock. In his book "The Trial of Henry
Kissinger", he wrote regarding Kissinger's role in Chile: "All of
above-cited crimes and many more besides, were committed on
Kissinger's 'watch' as secretary of state. And all of them were and
are punishable, under local and international law, or both."

Hitchens believes that Henry Kissinger could be brought to the dock
under four different sets of laws: 1) International Human Rights Law
comprising covenants on the rights of individual in relation to state,
as well as other actors in the international community. 2) The Law of
Armed Conflicts governing "law of war". 3) International Criminal Law
concerning any individual, including any agent of state, committing
atrocities against his "own 'citizens or citizens of another state' ".
4) Domestic Law and Law of Civil Liberties that govern crime such as
murder, kidnapping, etc. These laws in many cases permit a citizen of
any country to seek redress in the courts of offender's "host" country
or country of citizenship. In USA, one such statute is Alien Tort
Claim Act.

But alas! Laws are like cobwebs. Strong enough to detain Pinochets (or
Milosovics) but too weak to hold the Kissingers!

 

PS: A good September 11 barter would be trading Osama with Kissinger.

The writer is a freelance journalist based in Sweden.

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Life without art & music? Keep the arts alive today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FXrMlA/dnQLAA/Zx0JAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to