A French Brixton

  By Tim King
  Prospect | December 2005 
  http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7121

(Tim King is a writer living in France)

Recently I was asked by a French newspaper to write a portrait of
Montpellier—a foreigner's view of France's most desired town. Yet only
minutes from the chic shops and open-air cafés bursting with
well-dressed men and underdressed women—judged by François Truffaut to
be the most beautiful in France—I found poverty such as I have rarely
seen in Europe. This poverty of exclusion was quite different to the
Falls or the Shankill Road in Belfast, where I worked in the 1980s.
It's not just unemployment, it's not just that those in regular work
get paid half the national average—it is more that, since many of
these inhabitants have no identity papers, the French economy is
irrelevant to them. In its place there is an underground economy based
on drugs and gangs. Mainstream France is a world away. A year ago,
fire swept through one of the dilapidated blocks of flats here and a
man died—just like in Paris this summer. The people rioted—just like
in Paris earlier this month.


The first riot in Clichy-sous-bois at the end of October was not
treated by the press as anything exceptional— car-burning is routine
and there were far larger riots in the summer that were barely
reported. The difference this time was that the minister of the
interior, Nicolas Sarkozy, gave a now famously misinformed version of
the events which had caused the riot: he claimed that the two black
teenagers killed in the electricity substation had been caught
thieving and had hidden there to avoid arrest. The two boys were in
fact running away from a police identity check. They may have heard on
the text message grapevine that a 50-year-old white man, working on
public street lighting not far away, had just been murdered by black
youths. They may have assumed the police, looking for the murderers,
would show zero tolerance. The implication that their sons were
criminals outraged the boys' families. Moreover, a couple of days
earlier, Sarkozy had said, "I'll get rid of this scum" after residents
of a neighbouring suburb threw missiles at him.


Instead of apologising, Sarkozy maintained his inflammatory language
as the car-burnings continued. On the third night, a riot police
tear-gas grenade was fired either at, or perhaps even inside, a mosque
full of people at prayer. "People are furious," said the local imam of
this predominantly Moroccan community. "Islam has been insulted and no
one has said sorry. If tear gas had been fired into a church or
synagogue, Sarkozy would have gone to apologise." Thus, thanks to
Sarkozy, the sense of victimisation increased and religion was dragged
into what was until then a purely secular conflict.


But religion does not seem to be at the root of the riots: the suburbs
known to house radical Muslims have so far remained conspicuously
silent. No, the riots are about separation and poverty, of the type I
saw in Montpellier. Not just poverty in its older sense, though that
is part of it. It is the poverty caused by high expectations
unfulfilled, by discrimination, real and imagined, feeding a grievance
culture. It is poverty of interest on the part of the host nation, the
poverty of will on the part of politicians. Combined, these translate
into rage against authority, as in Brixton in 1981.


Take the hypocrisy over public housing. Since January 2002, urban
councils have had to ensure that 20 per cent of housing is set aside
for low-rent social accommodation. Councils which fail to provide 20
per cent are fined. But many councils prefer to pay the fine rather
than face voters objecting to the type of people in public housing. In
Paris, for instance, the waiting list for council accommodation is
300,000. One of the worst offenders, now named and shamed, is the town
of Neuilly-sur-Seine—a smart suburb across the river from the
troublespots—whose mayor is a certain Nicolas Sarkozy.


Meanwhile, Sarkozy is relentlessly building his political persona for
the presidential election in 2007. A few years ago he was wooing the
right with his free-market speeches. Then he stole the socialists'
thunder by vigorously subsidising ailing French companies. Until
recently, he believed he had le contact with Muslims (who make up
about 70 per cent of France's roughly 7-10 per cent ethnic minority
population), by championing positive discrimination, the immigrants'
right to vote and acknowledging (as the son of an immigrant himself)
that the republican way was not working for everyone. So he was
furious to be greeted with missiles and verbal abuse.


Since then, Sarkozy has been out-shooting the hard right in his
language. The left and many newspapers have accused him of adopting a
1950s-style populism à la Pierre Poujade (one of whose deputés was a
young Le Pen). There are calls for him to resign. But those who hoped
he would burn himself out in the riots—including his presidential
rival Dominique de Villepin—have been disappointed. As the riots
continued, Sarkozy's ratings stayed high while de Villepin's dropped.
Among other things, Clichy-sous-bois is a testing-ground for the 2007
presidential elections.


What deeply wounds la France d'en haut is the view that the riots
prove that France's policy of integration has failed. After the
successful conclusion of the hijab argument last year and then the
London bombings, France was convinced its system was the one that
worked. But integration is a complex beast; no country has solved it.
The French policy of assimilation—acceptance of all French values, no
visible cultural differences in public places—worked well for the
first generation of immigrants and some of their children. But the
state's refusal to acknowledge ethnic difference can also feel like a
snub. Moreover, it makes integrationist public policy harder to
formulate. Nobody knows for sure how many minority citizens there are,
or how Arabs and Africans perform in school or the job market compared
with the native French, because no one is allowed to count them.
Knowing how many French citizens are of Algerian or Senegalese origin
will not, on its own, guarantee them work, particularly the
high-profile work in government, media or management that would help
to create positive role models to counter the nihilism of the ghetto.
But it would be a start.


There seems to be little support for the rioters; people in France
profonde think of them as simple casseurs (breakers). Even the young
(white) adults I talk to have little sympathy and see no relationship
between their own lives and those of their suburban compatriots.


The rioters synchronise their actions via the internet and mobile
phones, but at the time of writing there was no central leadership or
spokesman. This makes it difficult for the government to negotiate
with them—unlike the students in 1968, the rioters are largely
inarticulate and don't really know what they want, other than
Sarkozy's resignation, or at least an apology. They are not burning
the cars or houses of the rich, they are burning their own. There are
echoes of anti-colonial resentment in their attacks on the symbols of
a France that they say has failed to respect or acknowledge
them—police and firefighters, schools and buses too. But mainly they
are wallowing in a self-destructive despair and enjoying their moment
of fame. 








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to