Hamas at the Helm 
 
  
By FOTINI CHRISTIA and SREEMATI MITTER, The New York Times,
January 27, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/27/opinion/27christia.html?th&emc=th

THE crescent has risen. The militant Islamic group Hamas won an 
astonishing 76 of 132 seats in the Palestinian legislative elections 
this week. The United States and the European Union must finally 
recognize Hamas's ascendance as a fait accompli. 

Until now, these key third parties have equivocated: they pressed 
Israel to allow Hamas to participate in the elections but threatened 
to cut aid and ties to a Hamas-dominated Palestinian Authority. The 
practical reality, however, is that Hamas is a pivotal player in 
Palestinian politics, and no peace process can succeed without at 
least the tacit acceptance of its leaders. Moreover, Hamas's 
participation in Palestinian politics is not necessarily a bad 
thing, and resisting it will very likely do more harm than good.

As a political party, Hamas revealed itself to be disciplined, 
pragmatic and surprisingly flexible. It fielded well-regarded 
candidates, including doctors and academics. In some cases, Hamas 
aligned itself with independents once affiliated with the secular 
Fatah party. And although the Hamas charter calls for the 
destruction of Israel and the liberation of Palestine "from the 
river to the sea," the party's campaign manifesto made no mention of 
these goals.

Instead, when asked about making peace with Israel, Hamas 
representatives offered nuanced, if evasive, answers. As Ziad Daiah, 
a Hamas representative in Ramallah, told us: "We are not interested 
in the Oslo-type peace process that went on for 10 years and wasted 
time. But if Israel will start new negotiations, with direct 
benefits for Palestinians in a useful time frame, we will accept 
that."

Judging from the thousands of green posters plastered around the 
West Bank and Gaza, external matters like the peace process were not 
central to Hamas's electoral agenda. Rather, its campaign focused on 
popular concerns like fighting corruption, establishing good 
governance and restoring the rule of law. Hamas's victory speeches 
have emphasized the need to revamp public services. 
To be sure, we should be careful not to read too much into Hamas's 
electioneering. The Hamas charter retains poisonous language toward 
Israel, and the group has yet to renounce its views on the place of 
violence in the Palestinian resistance. And Hamas's Islamist agenda 
continues to alarm many secular Palestinians, even those who welcome 
its entry into politics. 

Still, Hamas statements indicate that these attitudes are not set in 
stone. As Mohammed Ghazel, a Hamas leader in Nablus, told the 
Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, "The charter is not the Koran." And 
Hamas has done more than any other armed faction to honor the truce 
that President Mahmoud Abbas brokered in February. Although Israel 
continues to arrest its members, Hamas has done little to retaliate. 
Such restraint might have been an electoral strategy, but it still 
proves that if the incentives are right, Hamas can hold its fire.

In any case, the United States and Europe cannot trumpet democratic 
ideals abroad and then ignore the popular will of Palestinian 
voters, 78 percent of whom turned out for this election. Refusing to 
engage with Hamas, however skeptical one may be of its intentions, 
will only further legitimize the party; it could even give rise to 
violence. Moreover, cutting off aid to the Palestinian Authority, 
which is already in a fiscal crisis and enormously dependent on 
foreign aid, could bankrupt it, further destabilizing the region.
Hamas has indisputably become the force to be reckoned with in 
Palestinian politics. Even Israel seems to have awakened to this 
reality. A radio reporter recently asked Shimon Peres, the former 
Israeli prime minister, about negotiating with Hamas. "We are not 
fighting against a name," he said. "We are fighting against a 
situation. If the situation changes, then what difference does a 
name make?" 

If the Israelis are contemplating engagement, it's time the 
Americans and Europeans did, too.









--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to