Dogma Bites Man     

By Dr. Navaratna S. Rajaram, Hinduism Today, January 1995  

http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/1995/1/1995-1-08.shtml               

Like most Hindus, I often find myself perplexed when called upon to explain to 
others what Hinduism is. I find that the major difficulty a modern Hindu faces 
in defining Hinduism to others stems from his difficulty in defining it to 
himself. This is especially the case with the "educated Hindu" who has 
unconsciously acquired the habit of looking at himself and his civilization 
through Christian eyes. As a result, his reaction is invariably defensive, and 
he mumbles something like "essential truth in all religions," or sarva dharma 
samatva, or some such equally meaningless platitude. But this habit-of 
measuring something with alien values-is a very serious limitation if anyone 
wants to understand what Hinduism is about. 
   
  The problem runs deep. The vision and vocabulary of a revealed religion like 
Christianity and Islam are fundamentally unsuited to describing Hinduism, for 
Hinduism is an evolved and not a revealed religion. The problem is not just 
lack of sympathy, it is the severe limitation of the concept of religion as the 
revelations of a book or a prophet. Trying to understand Hinduism in terms of a 
revealed belief system or creed is like trying to understand quantum mechanics 
through Newton's laws of motion. It just cannot be done. One must try to 
understand Hinduism on its own terms, not in terms of the internal and external 
features borrowed from other creeds.    
  I approach this task as a scientist and not as a theologian or a "true 
believer." Though born into a Hindu family, I am not by any means a devout 
Hindu. I am only an example of the freedom of choice that Hinduism grants me in 
matters of ritual and practice. My interest in Hinduism stems from my work in 
history and philosophy of science. I discovered that the concept of 
mathematical proof can be traced to yogic principles described in the famous 
Yogasutra written by the legendary Sage Patanjali. This greatly intrigued me. 
The most rational of the rational sciences has religious and mystical roots! It 
will no doubt come as a surprise to many readers to learn that "rational 
thinking," something we all prize so highly, has mystical roots. Both Patanjali 
and the Greek Pythagoras were mystics, and yet they laid the foundation for the 
rational processes on which our own civilization depends. This is what made me 
look deeper into the religious thought of the Hindus and the Greeks.    
  Briefly, here are the five basic features of Hindusim I found in my research: 
   
  1) It has no historical beginning. The Rig Veda, the oldest of the Hindu 
scriptures, is stated to be eternal and to have always existed. Speaking as a 
scientist, I find this claim hard to accept. But there is no period in time 
which we can definitely point to and say, "This is when the Rig Veda began to 
be composed." Unlike Christianity and Islam, which are historical religions, we 
cannot find a specific date or even a century or millennium when Hinduism 
began. 
   
  2) It is not a revealed religion. It has no single authority or book. "Veda" 
simply means "knowledge that was discerned by the Vedic seers." It is not a 
theology or a belief system that everyone is required to acknowledge. A Hindu 
is free to question any or all of the scriptures. He does not cease being a 
Hindu for doing so. Hindu scripture is meant to be a guide. 
   
  3) Hinduism recognizes no prophet as having exclusive claim over religious 
truth. This is undoubtedly the greatest difference between Hinduism and 
revealed religions. A Hindu who believes in the existence of God (or Gods) is 
not required to acknowledge an intermediary as a prophet or as the chosen agent 
of God. Every Hindu man, woman and child has the same direct access to God 
through his or her own efforts. 
   
  4) Hinduism does not recognize claims of exclusivity or a clergy. Exclusivity 
divides the world into believers and nonbelievers, which Hinduism does not. As 
a result, Hinduism has no clergy to monitor and enforce belief. 
   
  5) The only "dogma" of Hinduism is freedom of choice and conscience. Hindu 
religious literature is concerned mainly with the knowledge and method 
necessary to learn the truth about God. Any accommodation of a belief system 
that denies one's freedom of choice and conscience is fundamentally 
incompatible with Hinduism. It is our duty to defend this precious freedom and 
preserve and pass it on to future generations. 
   
  Navaratna Rajaram is the Vice President of the International Institute of 
Indian Studies in Ottawa, Canada. He is a mathematician, computer scientist, 
linguist and a researcher in artificial intelligence and robotics. 
   
  Navaratna Rajaram is the Vice President of the International Institute of 
Indian Studies in Ottawa, Canada. He is a mathematician, computer scientist, 
linguist and a researcher in artificial intelligence and robotics. 











    
---------------------------------

                
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.





--
This is ZESTGlobal. Post articles on international affairs to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTGlobal by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/join/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to