http://thehoot.org/story.asp?storyid=Web5917728201Hoot115704%20PM2636&pn=1

8/1/2007
Purring about the 123 Agreement

In different words, the Hindustan Times said the same thing, as did
the Indian Express which has been the lead drummer for the deal.


You don't say!

Darius Nakhoonwala

Manmohan Singh, if not the UPA government as a whole, has made the
nuclear deal with the US the touchstone of his success, intending it
to be his lasting legacy. And, thanks to its drumbeaters in the media,
the US has been able to portray itself as a saviour of India's long
term technological and economic interests.


The resulting 123 deal that was agreed upon by the officials of the
two countries, therefore, was the biggest event of last week. One
would have expected all the major newspapers to write about it. In the
event only a handful did.


Most of them took an entirely predictable line, namely, that it was
the best thing to happen in a long, long time.   Thus:

"The Indo-US nuclear deal actually marks a new and unprecedented high
in the relationship between the two countries," said the Telegraph.
"That the treatment     (India is receiving) is special is undeniable.
This is the first time that Washington has made such an exception in
its non-proliferation policy for any country. Also, special care has
been taken not to jeopardize India's strategic autonomy or to
compromise the country's nuclear deterrent capability... India has
come in from beyond the pale. "

In different words, the Hindustan Times said the same thing, as did
the Indian Express which, in any case, has been the lead drummer for
the deal.  So did the Deccan Herald and the rest of the papers. The
Pioneer sulked, because Atal Bihari Vajpayee said that the deal was a
good one.


The Asian Age has always been a sceptic and it too did not present us
with any surprises. Its line was entirely predictable. It started off
laying the 'blame' squarely at the PM's doors. " The Prime Minister
has personally steered the 123 agreement through the Union Cabinet
without releasing the text, or showing it to the UPA allies and the
Opposition in what can only be perceived as scant regard for the
democratic institutions of India."

That opening blow delivered, it warmed to its task. "…the Bush
administration is insisting that discussions are still on and the
agreement is not final as yet. Then what has Prime Minister Singh
pushed through the Cabinet? The secrecy surrounding the negotiations,
and now the silence over the status of the agreement as well as the
content, have created a strong sense of unease in both New Delhi and
Washington. The government here is in the midst of a public relations
exercise in a bid to silence the critics from the media, the
scientific community and the political parties by giving select
portions of the agreement without the details."


And so on. You get the point?


Yeah, right. But the surprise came from the Hindu. This is very
significant because, as the Indian Pravda, what it says on such issues
usually represents the Left view.  And, folks, the Hindu was not doing
its usual act this time, all full of piss and vinegar. Instead, it
purred like a pussycat. In any case, I get very curious when an edit
starts with "although."


Thus the Hindu:

"Although the text of the draft nuclear cooperation agreement settled
in negotiations with the United States has not yet been made public,
official accounts of its contents indicate that the assurances
provided to Parliament by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh have been
fulfilled virtually in their entirety." Note no adjective, no comment.

The came a recap of the assurances the PM gave Parliament last July,
followed by the Hindu's assessment: "After last week's agreement, it
does seem that the first two concerns have been adequately addressed.
The last concern is more open-ended, requiring continuous vigilance."
Wow! Well, well, well. What do you know!!

The paper then listed all the nasty things the US had tried to do to
get the deal stacked in its favour. "The reason these concerns came to
the fore last year was the repeated attempt by Washington to dilute
its own commitments."

But, "after several rounds of difficult negotiations…Washington has
ended up conceding ground but New Delhi cannot claim to have had its
way wholly either. " Which, if I may make so bold, is the point of all
negotiations -- give-and- take.

"If it is confirmed that India has succeeded in protecting its
interests, credit must be given not just to the officials of the
Ministry of External Affairs, the Department of Atomic Energy, and the
Prime Minister's Office for their negotiating skills — but to all
those who took part in the robust and, at times, no-holds-barred
debate inside and outside Parliament" meaning the Hindu.

And the final endorsement: "From now on, the sequence of reciprocal
actions needed to make the July 2005 agreement a reality can be said
to favour India."

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Members of the ZESTMedia list exchange news and views about the media in 
Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives and Bhutan. Write to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTMedia by sending a blank 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

Get all ZESTMedia mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. 
Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED], OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

theZESTcommunity-------------------------------------------------

ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to