http://www.hindu.com/2009/07/25/stories/2009072556040900.htm
The White House’s unrelenting media machine Peter Baker President Obama complains about the news cycle but manipulates it, leaving many worried about the risks of overexposure. It has become his common lament. Challenged about difficulties with his economic or legislative programmes, U.S. President Barack Obama complains about the tyranny of “the news cycle,” pronouncing the words with an air of above-it-all disdain for the impatience and fecklessness of today’s media culture. Yet after six months in office, perhaps no other President has been more attuned to, or done more to dominate, the news cycle he disparages. Mr. Obama has given roughly three times as many interviews as George W. Bush and held four times as many prime-time news conferences as Bill Clinton had by comparable points in their terms. In the past four days, Mr. Obama gave “exclusive” interviews to Jim Lehrer of PBS, Katie Couric of CBS and Meredith Vieira of NBC. He gave two interviews to The Washington Post on one day, one to the editorial page Editor and one to news reporters. He held a conference call with bloggers. His hour-long session in the East Room on Wednesday night was his second news conference of the day. And on Thursday, he invited Terry Moran of ABC to spend the day with him for a “Nightline” special. The all-Obama, all-the-time carpet bombing of the news media represents a strategy by a White House seeking to deploy its most effective asset in service of its goals, none more critical now than health care legislation. But long-time Washington hands warn that saturation coverage can diminish the power of his voice and lose public attention. About 24.7 million viewers tuned in on Wednesday, according to Nielsen ratings, some 4 million fewer than watched his last evening news conference in April and 25 million fewer than saw his first in February. Mr. Obama’s focus on health care produced what Chuck Todd of NBC described as a “snoozer conference,” a line the Republican National Committee happily adopted. “I’m really perplexed. It’s unbelievable,” said Karen Hughes, Mr. Bush’s White House counsellor. “They’ve taken his greatest political asset — his gifts as a communicator — and totally diluted them. It’s been especially notable in the last couple weeks.” Some Democrats said Mr. Obama should worry about frittering away the novelty of his presence. “It’s a risk of overexposure,” said Joe Trippi, a political consultant. “If you use it all up on health care, you may not be able to use it on something else. But if you’re going to risk using it all up, this is the one to risk it on.” Past Presidents have been more exclusive in giving exclusives, believing they would have more impact that way. In their first four months, Mr. Clinton gave 11 interviews and Mr. Bush gave 18, compared with 43 by Mr. Obama, according to Martha Joynt Kumar, a presidential communications scholar at Towson State University. That has accelerated in recent days as Mr. Obama popped up in venues ranging from “Anderson Cooper 360” on CNN to “Dr. Nancy” on MSNBC. “In part, he is omnipresent because news organisations want to carry news about him, his goals, and his initiatives,” said Ms Kumar. “If he does not use the space he has available to him, he risks ceding it to his critics.” Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said the current news media world left little choice. “You worry about overexposure maybe very deeply in the back of your mind,” Mr. Gibbs said. “But the way the media is structured these days and the fact that it is so segmented and split up means that in order to get something to go through, you’ve got to do multiple platforms.” Mr. Obama prefers long-form sessions, eschewing the more typical way Presidents have used to get out their views. Past Presidents routinely took a couple questions from reporters during photo opportunities. Mr. Clinton answered questions 158 times this way in his first six months, compared with 30 times Mr. Obama has done so. If Mr. Obama is an energetic producer of news, he also seems to be an avid consumer. At Wednesday’s news conference, he seemed to address or borrow ideas from two columns in that morning’s newspapers. Steven Pearlstein, an economic columnist for The Washington Post, had written: “Among the range of options for health-care reform, there’s one that is sure to raise your taxes, increase your out-of-pocket medical expenses, swell the federal deficit, leave more Americans without insurance and guarantee that wages will remain stagnant. That’s the option of doing nothing.” During the news conference, Mr. Obama said: “If somebody told you that there is a plan out there that is guaranteed to double your health care costs over the next 10 years, that’s guaranteed to result in more Americans losing their health care, and that is by far the biggest contributor to our federal deficit, I think most people would be opposed to that. Well, that’s the status quo.” Similarly, David Leonhardt, an economics columnist for The New York Times, had written: “What’s in it for me? On the subject of health care reform, most Americans probably don’t have a good answer to the question. And that, obviously, is a problem for the White House and for Democratic leaders in Congress.” Mr. Obama responded in his opening remarks: “A lot of Americans may be wondering, ‘What’s in this for me? How does my family stand to benefit from health insurance reform?’ So tonight I want to answer those questions.” For those who missed those answers, not to worry. No doubt there will be another chance soon enough. — © 2009 The New York Times News Service ------------------------------------ -- INFORMATION OVERLOAD? Get all ZESTMedia mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to [email protected], OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/ PARTICIPATE Share media news, discuss journalism issues and network with media professionals across South Asia on this mailing list. Just write to [email protected] TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTMedia by sending a blank mail to [email protected] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/ Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
