http://www.dailynews.lk/2010/01/05/fea01.asp

Western media fuels conflicts
Dr. Kalinga Seneviratne

“Critics of developed countries have been rather slanted and sly in
categorising us Information Ministers as ‘Misinforming Ministers’.
Whatever they say, we have to carry out our responsibilities because
if we don’t inform, others will do the job for us,” warned Malaysia’s
Information, Communication and Culture Minister, Dr Rais Yatim in a
speech to the 10th Conference of ASEAN Ministers’ Responsible for
Information (AMRI) held in the Laotian Capital in November.

This was a strong theme of the conference titled ‘Enhancing Media
Cooperation in ASEAN Community Building’ and the conference also
included an AMRI + 3 component, where ASEAN Information Ministers were
joined by their counterparts from China, South Korea and Japan on the
second day. The East Asian giants were also in agreement with the need
to enhance Asian media cooperation.

Korea also added its voice to the call for Asian nations to pool their
media resources to blunt Western media’s power to set the regional
political and cultural agenda. “It is true that the global perception
of Asia is not that positive considering the region’s economic
influence.

To the eyes of the people of the other parts of the globe, Asia is no
more than a poor, peripheral region with a development gap, which
suffers economic crisis, terrorism and disasters,” observed Director
of the Media Policy Bureau at the Ministry of Culture, Sports and
Tourism in Seoul Kim Kab-soo, in an address to the first ever AMRI+3
conference.


Self employment opportunities provided for IDP youth in Kadirgamar
welfare village. Picture by Chaminda Hittetiya

East Asian viewpoints
Kim added that this ‘misrepresentation justifies the need for
enhancing media cooperation at the ASEAN+3 level’, as it is necessary
to ‘disseminate various uniquely East Asian viewpoints to the media in
the rest of the world’.

With the likes of the BBC, CNN and CNBC expanding rapidly in Asia and
the South in general, even the local media outlets in many parts of
the developing countries of the South depend on these media agencies
to be informed about what is happening around the world.

The question is, are we being properly informed or are we being
misinformed? The answer tends to be in the latter if we closely look
at how countries like Zimbabwe, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Iran,
Venezuela and China are being reported by the global (meaning Western)
media outlets.

Recently, when I tuned into BBC World Service Radio news one of the
news headlines said: “Sporadic battles have broken out between
protestors and Police in Iran following the death of a dissident
cleric”. The headline may persuade one to believe that the cleric -
Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri - was killed by the Iranian
Government, when in fact, he died of natural causes at the age of 87.

It could also be argued that such reporting could incite violence
within Iran because the small dissident groups know that they can get
international coverage for their protests if they can hook on to a
satellite phone or whatever to give the pictures and voices to media
outlets like the BBC and CNN.

When the rest of the media uncritically follow the news agenda set by
the Western media it creates fertile ground for Western interference
in the domestic affairs of countries in the South which are not
subservient to them, such as the current campaign to impose UN
Security Council sanctions against Iran or bring war crimes charges
against Sri Lanka or the campaign for sanctions against Robert
Mugabe’s Government in Zimbabwe or the military regime in Myanmar or
the attempts to blame China for the failure of the Copenhagen Climatic
Change Conference.

At the World Electronic Media Conference in Kuala Lumpur in December
2008, I pointed out to the Director of News at the BBC who had just
given a lecture on BBC’s core values (based on fairness and balance)
that they have started calling Myanmar by its old name Burma lately
when all international organisations recognise Myanmar as the official
name for the country, and when I asked a BBC reporter recently she
said “we do not recognise a name given to it by a military regime”. If
that is so hasn’t BBC taken sides and how can I trust your news
reports in respect to Myanmar? His response was that the people in
Britain know the country as Burma and that is why they use that name.
For me it was a meek response to cover up an obvious misinformation
campaign.

Global Media Forum
In June 2008, I was at a Global Media Forum in Bonn organised by
Deutschewella Radio and met a young Ugandan journalist. In the course
of the conversation I said I live in Singapore which is next door to
the world’s largest Muslim country Indonesia. His immediate response
was, “You must be having problems with Islamic terrorism in
Singapore?” “Not at all” I said, and I went on to explain to him that
I visit Indonesia often as part of my work, and many Indonesians have
told me over the past few years that 95 percent of Indonesians are
secular Muslims (meaning liberal Muslims) and five percent are
fanatics who are the only Indonesians Western media likes to talk
about. Thus Indonesians themselves complain that the International
media misinforms the rest of the world about their country.

There has been a similar misinformation campaign waged by the Western
media and BBC in particular - against President Mugabe and Zimbabwe
over the past decade or so. It all started when Mugabe’s ZANU-PF
ruling party members stormed White owned farms in the country and
occupied them protesting against lack of land for the country’s Black
majority.

Under the Lancaster House constitution the British imposed on Zimbabwe
at the time of liberation in 1980, the government could only buy White
land from willing sellers. When this expired after ten years, the
Government passed a law empowering it to make compulsory purchases.
More than 20 years after the country was liberated from White-rule
some 4,500 White farmers own 70 percent of the best farmlands in the
country.

Thus, since March 2000, a group of war veterans of ZANU-PF have
occupied many White-owned farms claiming this as their dividends for
fighting the war of liberation.

If one were to cover Zimbabwe’s conflict in a fair and balanced
manner, should you not focus on the unfairness of a few privileged
rich White farmers owning 70 percent of the land while most Blacks are
landless and suffer in poverty? For the BBC unfairness started when
the Black masses started to grab the land of the rich White minority.
Would the BBC take the side of the farmers if they were rich Black
land owners? Certainly not, BBC would have depicted them as a corrupt
selfish rich minority who enjoy political patronage, as they do when
reporting similar conflicts between rich landowners and the masses in
many former colonies of the West.

Let me now focus on the latest misinformation campaign by the BBC and
the Western media on a developing country of the South. It is the
campaign against the Government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa in Sri
Lanka - the country where I was born and raised. Thus, I have followed
closely Western media reporting of Sri Lanka in recent years.

Terrorist groups
In May 2009, the Sri Lankan Armed Forces defeated one of the most
ruthless terrorist groups in the world - the Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE) - which has been terrorising the small island
republic for over 25 years. During the final battle on May 19 the Army
wiped out almost the whole leadership of the LTTE who were taking
refuge behind some 150,000 Tamil civilians who were being held as
human shields by the rebels. Most of these civilians survived the
battle and were taken into government controlled refugee centres.

The International media has failed to acknowledge a rare success story
in fighting terrorism. They have not been able to focus on how a small
country with limited resources - compared to almost unlimited
financial and military resources available to NATO Forces in
Afghanistan - was able to defeat a terror group who had a lot of
backing from official and unofficial sources in the West.

Instead they are happy to swallow lock, stock and barrel LTTE
propaganda manufactured in Western cities like Toronto, London, Paris
and Sydney, by the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora who have supported the
LTTE with funds to buy arms to wage their terror campaign in Sri Lanka
for most part of the past 25 years.

Though Sri Lanka has won the military battle they have not won the
global propaganda battle against the LTTE. Recent attempts by some
Western countries to force the UN Human Rights Commission to mount a
war crimes investigation against Sri Lanka for the conduct of the
final stages of battle against LTTE and EU’s recent suspension of
trade concessions to Sri Lanka - which could cripple its garment
industry in particular which employs tens of thousands of women from
rural areas - are two such issues, where the LTTE propaganda machine
is playing a leading role.

For Sri Lankan Tamils to get easier access to the greener pastures of
the West (as political refugees fleeing repression in their homeland),
they have to keep the flame of human rights violations burning. Thus
they have made a mountain out of a molehill by exaggerated claims
about human rights abuses in the IDP (Internationally Displaced
Persons) camps in the North where an estimated 150,000 Tamils are
being held. They have painted these as Nazi-era type concentration
camps, where people are held at gunpoint and Western journalists have
taken their propaganda without examining it critically and spread it
across the world.

The LTTE propagandists in the West have cleverly exploited the
gullibility of the Western media to claims of human rights violation
in a country of the South.

LTTE cadres
The Sri Lankan Government has repeatedly emphasised that the IDPs
cannot be let loose that easy because of sophisticated landmines LTTE
has planted all over the area and the Government also fears that
thousands of LTTE cadres have escaped to the centres at the end of the
war and they need to be weaned out before the centres are emptied.

The Western media which criticise the IDP welfare centres in Sri Lanka
seem to forget Guatanamo Bay in Cuba and scores of such camps the West
operates around the world to hold suspected Al-Queda or Taliban
terrorists. Also the same media that accuse Sri Lanka of war crimes
gleefully report on pentagon statements without questioning, that says
that Taliban militants have been killed by bombs dropped by US
unmanned aircraft over Pakistan, as if no civilians live in those
areas.

Sri Lankans have been incensed by the glaring double standards in the
West’s call for a war crimes investigation in Sri Lanka while covering
up their own actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Sri Lanka’s current ambassador to the UN Dr. Palitha Kohona, a former
Australian and UN diplomat, responding to a question in an interview
on Australia’s ABC Radio last year, said, “those who point fingers at
us, should have three fingers in each hand pointing towards them
hidden inside their pockets”.

They will only see those fingers, when the Western journalists let go
their prejudices against leaders in developing countries who are not
subservient to the West.

The writer is the Head of Research at the Asian Media Information and
Communication Centre in Singapore. He has written this piece in his
personal capacity and not on behalf of his employer.


------------------------------------

--
INFORMATION OVERLOAD? 
Get all ZESTMedia mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. 
Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to 
[email protected], OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your 
settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE
Share media news, discuss journalism issues and network with media 
professionals across South Asia on this mailing list. Just write to 
[email protected] 

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTMedia by sending a blank 
mail to [email protected] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by 
visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTCaste: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to