On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Tobias Schlitt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/12/2010 12:30 PM, James Pic wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Tobias Schlitt <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On 08/12/2010 09:38 AM, Jerome Renard wrote: > >>>> I propose the following process : >>>> James and I (and actually anyone interested in the topic) should discuss >>>> our >>>> views on >>>> the -dev mailing-list so it is transparent to anyone. And then write a >>>> proposal document >>>> after a concensus has been found. >>>> >>>> What do you think ? > >>> that sounds pretty good. Looking forward to it! :) > >> Should we try to add section-level inheritance as i suggested earlier >> (ie. [childSection..parentSection]) to the requirements doc or should >> we work on the design doc directly? > > If this is a requirement for you, I'd suggest to add it to the > requirements, yes. :)
Thanks for the answer ;) In that case i'm heavily interrested in another enhancement: multiline string configuration values support. Maybe it would not break BC if implemented like php's heredoc syntax? What do you think? -- http://jamespic.com/contact Customer is king - Le client est roi - El cliente es rey.
