Craig, On 08/17/2010 08:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Other projects allow wider access to edit wiki pages. The ones I'm aware > of restrict editing to folks who have signed an ICLA. This does two things: > > 1. It raises the bar for potential wrong-doers (spammers); > > 2. It allows the project to use the ideas in the wiki without worrying > that the contributor didn't intend the wiki comments as a contribution. > > That said, you can restrict wiki edit privileges however you (the > project) want to. I'm just suggesting that you might find it easier to > deal with roles than individuals as a restriction tool.
thanks for your input. I think this is quite valuable. To which degree do we need to care about taking over stuff from the wiki into our real docs, if a user without iCLA contributed it? Let me give an example: If a user writes a short example code snippet (whatever 3-5 lines) which we would consider valuable to have in the real docs, would he need to sign an iCLA? Regards, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt http://schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 Want to hire me? Need quality assurance? http://qafoo.com eZ Components are Zeta Components now! http://bit.ly/9S7zbn
