On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 21:28 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > My preference is to change it. Its basically a complete rebrand and > > when ZC offers some kind of helper script for users to at least > > announce the files which use the wrong prefix, everything should be > > pretty ok. I also think it's the last chance to do such a change. When > > the next release is out people will claim about backwards > > compatiblity. > > > > OK would like to hear you opinions on the prefix change. > > I would like to change it too. We're Apache Zeta Components now. Besides > the rebrand, because this is a BC breaking change, we should also go > through the code and clean up the @apichange bits.
I still strongly oppose any BC breaks. ezc is used a lot in different applications (I alone maintain 4 or 5) - and it would be a hell lot of work to verify that those still work properly. BC is one of the key points for ezc / zeta - and breaking with this is something I would really really dislike to see. A prefix does not mean anything anyways, it is just a prefix… Kind regards, Kore -- Kore Nordmann (GPG 0xDDC70BBB) - What I do: http://kore-nordmann.de/portfolio.html - Motivate me: http://wishlist.kore-nordmann.de/ - Hire me: http://qafoo.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
