Hi Max, On 11/18/2010 09:21 AM, Maxime Thomas wrote: > Actually only the packaging of zeta matters as we want to provide > everything or a part of it. The jQuery UI package download system > seems to be a good start, I guess. Another question comes if we do > like this : will it be possible to make heterogeneous packages with > this system. I mean can I ask Graph 1.0 with Config 3.2 ? or do I have > a minimum rules to follow ?
I really don't think we can provide such a system in the short term. There are a lot of things to be taken into account, like the few package dependencies we have (Database <- PersistentObject, e.g.), bug fixes in Base and so on. So, my proposal is still to have a full bundle package every $x months, containing all recent stable component release. And independent release cycles per component, while these versions are only provided through the PEAR channel. > Max (Thomas is my last name, guys) Oops, so sorry. Will try to remember. :) Regards, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt http://schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 Want to hire me? Need quality assurance? http://qafoo.com eZ Components are Zeta Components now! http://bit.ly/9S7zbn
