On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > On 01/24/2011 11:18 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > > >> I discovered an issue with dependent tests in Template and provided > >> a patch for it in [1]. My fix introduces a new method on > >> ezcTemplateConfiguration in order to be able to set a fresh > >> configuration instance for every test case. > >> > >> Please review the patch and give me feedback if the solution is OK > >> to you. > > > I am not really happy with this, but I always hated the singleton > > template configuration as well. The correct way would be to get rid > > of the singleton crap here all together, but in the meanwhile this > > works as a good workaround. > > I fully agree with you about the static dependency. However, getting > rid of it without breaking BC is pretty hard. > > I'm going to commit my patch so that we can ship around it in tests. > The new method does not really hurt and can maybe even be of use for > users.
I would suggest to mark it with @access private; as I would not recommend using this! cheers, Derick
