Darren J Moffat wrote: > George Wilson wrote: >> New code should either update the SPA_VERSION whenever you change the >> on-disk format and/or the new ZPL_VERSION whenever you change the Posix >> layer. > > That is what I thought but as you say it is currently a little confusing. > > Given that I believe that for ZFS Crypto I should only be changing > SPA_VERSION since adding crypto doesn't change anything to do with ZPL.
That's correct. Generally, you would need to bump the ZPL_VERSION if a system running older bits could not correctly interpret a newer filesystem received by "zfs recv". --matt
