Darren J Moffat wrote: > Bill Sommerfeld wrote: >> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 14:15, Neil Perrin wrote: >>> Of course we would need to stress the dangers of setting 'deferred'. >>> What do you guys think? >> >> I can think of a use case for "deferred": improving the efficiency of a >> large mega-"transaction"/batch job such as a nightly build. > > Yum Yum!! > > We could even build this into nightly(1) once we have user delegation to > create clones. > > nightly(1) would zfs clone, zfs set reservation=, zfs set sync=deferred, > and when it is done release the reservation unset deffered and snapshot. > > When we can have it ?
Before we get too far down that path, has anyone timed a nightly with and without the zil_disable'd ? Dana _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
