On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:07 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
The 2.6.x Linux client is much nicer... one thing fixed was the client doing too many commits (which translates to fsyncs on the server). I would still recommend the Solaris client but i'm sure that's no surprise. But if you'r'e stuck on Linux, upgrade to the latest stable 2.6.x and i'd be curious if it was better.
I'd love to be on kernel 2.6 but due to the philosophical stance towards OpenAFS of some people on the lkml list[1], moving to 2.6 is a tough call for us to do. But that's another story for another list. The fact is that I'm stuck on 2.4 for the time being and I'm having problems with a Solaris/ZFS NFS server that I'm (and Jan) are not having with Solaris/UFS and (in my case) Linux/XFS NFS server.
[1] https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2006-July/ 014041.html
/dale _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
