-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Ahrens wrote: > Out of curiosity, what would you guys think about addressing this same > problem by having the option to store some filesystems unreplicated on > an mirrored (or raid-z) pool? This would have the same issues of > unexpected space usage, but since it would be *less* than expected, that > might be more acceptable. There are no plans to implement anything like > this right now, but I just wanted to get a read on it.
+1, especially in a two disk (mirrored) configuration. Currently I use two ZFS pools: one mirrored and other unmirrored spreaded over two disks (each disk partitioned with SVM). And I'm constantly fighting the fill-up of one pools while the other is empty. My current setup have the same space balance problem that a traditional two *static* partition setup. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRQlwoJlgi5GaxT1NAQLR7gP8C3QHCkvRznthRZNZ6sCfhtD/y+am7b2V +JrPBD0RRHkD65ZKhj6r3Ss4ypkjlSo82+pMdnPdIQUpNKoqmwEyAqfvXvdqm7A+ Yks5Ac5e9ris2Sz3o7wruFixkLOJSoKrUS8TR1TpvnXlHE8l3U4Q2uEgzwKr4s8F k/AR3VC70pg= =BCz2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
