On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:


On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:

"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:

Chad> snoop does not show me the reply packets going back.  What do I
Chad> need to do to go both ways?

It's possible that performance issues are causing snoop to miss the
replies.

If your server has multiple network interfaces, it's more likely that
the server is routing the replies back on a different interface. We've
run into that problem many times with the NFS server that has my home
directory on it.  If that is what's going on, you need to fire up
multiple instances of snoop, one per interface.

OK, I will try that. I did run tcpdump on the BSD client as well so the responses should show up there as well as it only has the 1 interface on that net while the Solaris box has 3.

That got me thinking. Since I had 3 "dedicated" ports to use for nfs, I changed it so each is on its own network (192.168.2 .3 . 4) so there is no port switcheroo on incoming and outgoing port. I also upgraded the FreeBSD to catch any bge updates and patches (there were some I think but I am not sure they had anything to do with my issue). Anyway, after doing both of these my issue seems to have gone away... I am still testing / watching but I have not seen or experienced the issue in a day. I am not sure which one "fixed" my problem but it seems to have gone away.

Thanks
Chad




Thanks
Chad


mike

---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net



_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to