On 10/5/06, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/6/06, David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the big problems with CVS and SVN and Microsoft SourceSafe is
> that you don't have the benefits of version control most of the time,
> because all commits are *public*.
David,
That is exactly what "branch" is for in CVS and SVN. Dunno much about
M$ SourceSafe.
I've never encountered branch being used that way, anywhere. It's
used for things like developing release 2.0 while still supporting 1.5
and 1.6.
However, especially with merge in svn it might be feasible to use a
branch that way. What's the operation to update the branch from the
trunk in that scenario?
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
