Hello Luke, Wednesday, November 1, 2006, 12:13:28 AM, you wrote:
LL> Robert, LL> On 10/31/06 3:10 PM, "Robert Milkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Even then I would try first to test with more real load on ZFS as it >> can turn out that ZFS performs better anyway. Despite problems with >> large sequential writings I find ZFS to perform better in many more >> complex scenarios. So in real life ZFS could actually perform better >> in your environment than in that simple test. LL> I'd withhold all judgement about sequential I/O until you've tested the LL> fixes in snv_50+ LL> We've seen more than 2,000 MB/s of sequential transfer rate on 36 disks. Right now with S10U3 beta with over 40 disks I can get only about 1.6GB/s peak. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
