I updated to Sol10u3 last night, and I'm still seeing different differences between "du -h" and "ls -h".
"du" seems to take into account raidz and compression -- if this is correct, please let me know. It makes sense that "du" reports actual disk usage, but this makes some scripts I wrote very broken (need real sizes of files in a directory to be able to put them on dvd isos). Sol10u3 on 3 disk RaidZ: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/burnout/2006-11-30]$ ls -lh JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 splus splus 3.5G Dec 1 10:15 JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/burnout/2006-11-30]$ du -hs JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso 5.2G JMS-data-1-2006-11-30.iso Thanks, Jeb This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
